These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Hospital attempts to stifle admissions to competing facilities: Potters decision. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1987 Mar; 10(7):3-6. PubMed ID: 10281336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical staff antitrust decisions examine defenses available to defendants. Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Jun; 7(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 10104849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Peer review after Patrick case is alive and well. Holthaus D Hospitals; 1988 Oct; 62(20):34. PubMed ID: 3169708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Peer review: Patrick redux. Cohen HH Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 10104770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Staff privileges--$2 million antitrust judgment reversed. Carlson DR Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(21):1-4. PubMed ID: 10284024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Avoiding antitrust pitfalls in peer assistance programs. Hammaker MK J Am Health Care Assoc; 1985 Sep; 11(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10272795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Groups seek protection for peer review. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 Jan; 18(4):4. PubMed ID: 10285506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Appeals Court limits antitrust review of physician-hospital disputes. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Sep; 11(19):3-4. PubMed ID: 10288887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Are hospital peer review committees immune from federal antitrust liability? FitzGerald RM; Howarth BM Med Group Manage J; 1989; 36(1):14. PubMed ID: 10291907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Anti-trust law and exclusive services contracts. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1984 Jun; 40(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 10278254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Anticompetitive conduct: the committee on peer review. Harris A Colo Med; 1990 Jul; 87(7):192-3. PubMed ID: 2394081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. FTC, medical staffs reach agreements. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 Feb; 18(6):6. PubMed ID: 10285864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The antitrust laws: implications for physician staff privileges. Peters ME J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1987; 10(2):206-18. PubMed ID: 10286042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient care not enough as defense for provider conduct. Hammaker MK Provider; 1987 Dec; 13(12):30-1, 40. PubMed ID: 10285093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Denying hospital privileges to non-physicians: does quality of care justify a potential restraint of trade? Reindl G Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1988 May; 9(11):7-39. PubMed ID: 10286963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Peer review after Patrick. Gebhard PG; Polk DJ Bull Am Coll Surg; 1988 Oct; 73(10):4-7. PubMed ID: 10289975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Court: activity must affect Interstate Commerce to invoke Sherman Act. Carlson DR Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):7-9. PubMed ID: 10276712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Hospital law: the spiraling cost of litigation. Hollowell EE South Hosp; 1984; 52(5):66-7. PubMed ID: 10268456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]