184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278371)
1. The impact of MUMPS on system development.
Blume P
Softw Healthc; 1985; 3(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 10278371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A computerized medical information system--sustaining benefits previously achieved.
Blask D; Cleary J; Dux L
Healthc Comput Commun; 1985 Dec; 2(12):60-4. PubMed ID: 10311368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. St. Joseph's studies computerized patient systems.
Kuhn R
Hosp Trustee; 1985; 9(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 10270935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. $2 billion spent on systems, but hospitals still dissatisfied.
Dorenfest SI
Mod Healthc; 1982 Nov; 12(11):65-6, 68, 70. PubMed ID: 10309760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ending a computer nightmare.
Shoer SH
South Hosp; 1986 Mar; 54(2):35. PubMed ID: 10278383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Selecting an electronic clinical data system.
Hollers FK; Koch LA
Caring; 1997 Dec; 16(12):46-50. PubMed ID: 10176256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cases in hospital laboratory computerization: an organization development perspective.
Gamm LD; O'Connor P
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1987; 9(3):369-87. PubMed ID: 10301825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The medical information system: an administrative planning and marketing tool.
Eady C; Sifferle J
Top Health Rec Manage; 1982 Sep; 3(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 10256850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Criteria for evaluating and choosing a computer system.
Dunn MD
Hosp Prog; 1974 May; 55(5):73-5. PubMed ID: 4827192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of a case mix information system.
Lewis J; Maupin G; O'Donnell E; Sauer A
Comput Healthc; 1983 Feb; 4(2):36-41. PubMed ID: 10309837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. American hospitals evaluate their computer systems in 1984.
Grams RR
Comput Healthc; 1985 Feb; 6(2):16-20. PubMed ID: 10269627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Information system flexibility.
Poggio FL
Comput Healthc; 1986 Apr; 7(4):36-8. PubMed ID: 10300584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hospitals struggling to develop standards.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1984 Sep; 14(12):140. PubMed ID: 10310780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated information systems: avoid pitfalls in purchase.
Bandy D
Tex Hosp; 1985 Oct; 41(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 10275723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Case mix management systems.
Bates SW; Hamilton RA; Clark JD
Mich Hosp; 1984 Aug; 20(8):24-9. PubMed ID: 10310720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What works. Clinical data/information system provides information within seconds.
Dean K
Health Manag Technol; 1999 Apr; 20(3):46-7. PubMed ID: 10351278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Buying a healthcare information system.
Clegg TA
J Healthc Resour Manag; 1998; 16(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 10177065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Planning for information systems in small or rural hospitals.
Booth B; DeSalvo CP
Comput Healthc; 1985 Aug; 6(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 10300246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing a database management system for decision support.
Cunningham L; Heinrich L; Hoit J
Comput Healthc; 1985 Aug; 6(8):34-6. PubMed ID: 10311201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Networking microcomputers ... the advantages and disadvantages.
Poggio FL
Healthc Comput Commun; 1986 Apr; 3(4):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 10276180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
