These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278385)

  • 1. May hospitals differentiate between osteopaths, allopaths?
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1986 Feb; 41(9):12-3. PubMed ID: 10278385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fifth Circuit upholds requirement of additional training for osteopaths to qualify for medical staff privileges.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1986 Jul; 1(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 10278406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospitals must apply same standards to osteopathic and allopathic physicians.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1983 Mar; 64(3):76. PubMed ID: 10324426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Osteopaths score their biggest court victory yet.
    Brown S
    Med Econ; 1984 Aug; 61(16):230-1, 235-8. PubMed ID: 10278257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ruling shows hospitals may be liable for the actions of their medical staffs.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1985 Jan; 15(1):124-6. PubMed ID: 10278316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do DOs and MDs have equal rights to hospital staff privileges?
    LaMarca GA
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Aug; 7(8):4-6. PubMed ID: 263730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Who has the privilege to practice medicine in Texas hospitals?
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1985 Aug; 41(3):25. PubMed ID: 10272951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of legislated integration.
    Krider BG
    OH; 1978 May; 22(5):15-8. PubMed ID: 10307062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital staff privileges & the new Texas Medical Practice Act.
    Tex Med; 1982 Jan; 78(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 7054918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court upholds hospital board's denial of staff privileges.
    Pickens A
    Tex Med; 1979 Jan; 75(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 425042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Law-medicine notes. Medical-staff privileges in private hospitals: Can modern hospitals exclude uncooperative applicants?
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1981 Mar; 304(10):589-91. PubMed ID: 7453727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fifth Circuit: hospitals did not violate the Sherman Act.
    Fraiche DD; Carlson WT
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 10277100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent case offers hospitals new protection from antitrust liability.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1985 Jul; 41(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 10278343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New due process protections for Texas physicians.
    Alt HA
    Tex Med; 1985 Oct; 81(10):68-70. PubMed ID: 4060081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Damages for emotional distress awarded to physician whose hospital privileges were removed.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Nov; 7(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10296159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MD sued hospital after termination as temporary employee.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1979 Nov; 60(11):78, 80. PubMed ID: 488991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hospital must pay damages to podiatrists for bylaws.
    Am Med News; 1978 May; 21(18):6. PubMed ID: 10325016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exclusive contracts and hospital-based physicians.
    Tex Med; 1981 Jul; 77(7):68-71. PubMed ID: 7256678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assured with standardized review procedure.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1986 Jun; 42(1):22. PubMed ID: 10277256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Liability for peer review and privilege suspension.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1984 Jul; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 10267575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.