253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278588)
1. AHA, others granted summary judgment in Michigan chiropractor antitrust case.
Mitchell SM
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):1-3. PubMed ID: 10278588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Perspectives. Chiropractors: AMA's bone of contention.
Olson EG
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Apr; 44(14):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10104063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Wilk v. American Medical Association--AMA enjoined from advocating boycott of chiropractors; individual choice endorsed.
Cohen HH
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 10286483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. FTC rules on Michigan and Indiana antitrust cases.
Rose A
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Mar; 6(6):7-9. PubMed ID: 10278148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Trustee involvement in staff appointments: an antitrust Rx.
Klein RM
Mich Hosp; 1987 May; 23(5):31-3. PubMed ID: 10281882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 3rd Circuit finds evidence insufficient for antitrust summary judgment.
Carlson DR
Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 10287416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. District court denies summary judgment on physician's antitrust claim.
Urbanski MF
Health Law Vigil; 1988 Oct; 11(21):5-6. PubMed ID: 10288891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital competition and antitrust: the Federal Trade Commission staff report.
Miles JJ
Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(14):6-10. PubMed ID: 10282648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal antitrust laws and hospital concerns.
Gramza M; Gire M
Hosp Admin Curr; 1983; 27(3):13-8. PubMed ID: 10261676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An interpretation of the Appeals Court decision in the AHSC group purchasing contract case.
Decker R
Hosp Purch Manage; 1984 Mar; 9(3):13-5. PubMed ID: 10278238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. AHA joins appeal in antitrust case.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1990 Apr; 20(16):8. PubMed ID: 10104449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health planning and antitrust law: the implied amendment doctrine of the Rex Hospital case.
Havighurst CC
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Sep; 6(7):7-36. PubMed ID: 10268127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antitrust claims separate chiropractors, providers.
Burda D
Hospitals; 1986 Sep; 60(18):34. PubMed ID: 3744338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Antitrust law and the physician entrepreneur.
Relman AS
N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(14):884-5. PubMed ID: 4033717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Competition and the antitrust laws: restraint of trade in a competitive market.
Cost Containment; 1982 Oct; 4(20):3-5. PubMed ID: 10257042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bork's stand on antitrust may change healthcare.
Kenkel PJ
Mod Healthc; 1987 Jul; 17(16):69, 71. PubMed ID: 10282817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospitals and antitrust laws: a contemporary reality.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1981 Dec; 55(23):53-5 concl. PubMed ID: 7298035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What does antitrust ruling really mean?
Decker R
Hosp Purch Manage; 1982 Jul; 7(7):11-4. PubMed ID: 10255954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Information-sharing and the antitrust laws.
Baurer T
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1985; 3(6):70-1. PubMed ID: 10274855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Antitrust implications for health planning.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1984 May; 39(12):59, 61-2. PubMed ID: 10266793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
