These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278604)

  • 1. Editors' Forum on physician peer review ... views of the editors of some of medicine's most prominent publications.
    Internist; 1986 Jul; 27(6):19-21. PubMed ID: 10278604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
    Kearney MH; Freda MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utilization and peer review. Medicine's privilege and responsibility.
    Schaffarzick RW; Parke HJ
    Calif Med; 1970 Aug; 113(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 5527892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
    Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
    Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey.
    Wager E; Fiack S; Graf C; Robinson A; Rowlands I
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 19482976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Editors' review of 2006 and the BJCP prize.
    Aronson JK; Lennard MS; Ritter JM; Begg EJ; Lewis LD; Schachter M
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 17229039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From collegial to codified. The evolution of modern peer review.
    Watts C
    Tex Med; 1995 Sep; 91(9):22-4. PubMed ID: 7570381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases.
    Leiker M
    WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Clinical Research Forum and Association of American Physicians disagree with criticism of the NIH Roadmap.
    Crowley W; Courtney J; Jameson L; Pardes H; Moskowitz J; Orringer E; Rubenstein A; Wood A; Rettig R; Ausiello D; Brenner D; Collins F; Elias J; Greene W; Horowitz R; Jameson L; Kieff E; Thompson C; Swain JL
    J Clin Invest; 2006 Aug; 116(8):2058-9. PubMed ID: 16886049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advertising in dermatology journals: journals' and journal editors' policies, practices, and attitudes.
    Bartus CL; Katz KA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 55(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 16781302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical reviewing policies in dermatology journals: results of a questionnaire survey of editors.
    Katz KA; Crawford GH; Lu DW; Kantor J; Margolis DJ
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Aug; 51(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 15280842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospitals coping with the shadow of peer review.
    Tokarski C
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Dec; 19(52):22-4, 30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 10296739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial: Peer review.
    Calif Med; 1970 Aug; 113(2):69-70. PubMed ID: 5527886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is peer review coming of age?
    Thorpe JH
    Med World News; 1989 Jun; 30(11):81. PubMed ID: 10293400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protecting medicine's professionalism.
    Volpintesta EJ
    Conn Med; 2000 Feb; 64(2):120. PubMed ID: 10743753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meeting more explicit peer review imperatives.
    Spath P
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Aug; 32(8):111-4. PubMed ID: 17763627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When should case be sent for external peer review?
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Jul; 32(7):94, 99-100. PubMed ID: 17685064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PLoS Medicine's Advisory Group on Publication Ethics.
    PLoS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2007 Feb; 4(2):e81. PubMed ID: 17570743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review not a panacea.
    J Med Soc N J; 1971 Sep; 68(9):697. PubMed ID: 5285949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.