These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10278907)

  • 1. PRO--physicians win preliminary challenges.
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Nov; 9(22):13-4. PubMed ID: 10278907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medicare sanctions--do providers have a right to a pre-termination hearing?
    Aronson P; Cuden CT
    Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1986; 19(6):56-7. PubMed ID: 10301235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exclusions of problem physicians upheld in two cases.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1997 Dec; 15(2):3-7. PubMed ID: 10175627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PRO release of medical information. Implications for Missouri physicians and hospitals.
    Akhter MN
    Mo Med; 1985 Nov; 82(11):695-7. PubMed ID: 4069102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Despite White House hostility, peer review for doctors is moving ahead.
    Demkovich LE
    Natl J (Wash); 1983 Oct; 15(43):2168-9. PubMed ID: 10273401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nader group sues on PSRO records.
    Holcomb B
    Health Care Week; 1978 Feb; 1(30):1, 22. PubMed ID: 10306305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The WVMI PRO and Delaware physicians.
    Duncan WH
    Del Med J; 1988 Mar; 60(3):145-7. PubMed ID: 3366284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How much do you risk when you review a colleague's work?
    Crane M
    Med Econ; 1989 Sep; 66(17):23-6, 28. PubMed ID: 10294728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "You have to run as fast as you can just to stay where you are".
    Keeley RL; Geoffrey LS
    Va Med; 1977 Nov; 104(11):787-90. PubMed ID: 563142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Update: PSRO transmittal. Peer review by health care practitioners other than physicians.
    Rogers J
    Med Rec News; 1977 Apr; 48(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 10305612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Milwaukee group using peer review information to screen physicians.
    Plous FK
    Contract Healthc; 1988 Mar; ():30. PubMed ID: 10296833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PRO review: strategies for HMOs.
    Siegel SH; Albritton PM; Thornhill MC
    GHAA J; 1988; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10302958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. They've developed a Texas-sized review program.
    Stacey J
    Am Med News; 1978 Aug; 21(32):11. PubMed ID: 10308657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A 20-year experience with malpractice screening panels.
    Kridelbaugh WW; Palmisano DJ
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 May; 82(5):21-3. PubMed ID: 10167808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DC District Court invalidates PRO photocopying rule and PRO directive.
    Manning MM; Rothschild IS
    Health Law Vigil; 1987 Dec; 10(26):3. PubMed ID: 10285309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From PSRO to PRO to...
    Allendorf L
    Internist; 1984 Jan; 25(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 10273464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PSROs turn PRO.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1982 Nov; ():1-4. PubMed ID: 10273311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PRO regulations proposed.
    McIlrath S
    Am Med News; 1983 Aug; 26(30):1, 18. PubMed ID: 10324386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New requirements issued for PRO scope of work.
    Banach J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Dec; 59(12):24-5. PubMed ID: 10290726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legislative currents. Acquisition, protection, and disclosure of PRO information.
    Cofer J
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jul; 55(7):43-6. PubMed ID: 10310705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.