These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10279109)
21. Hospital reimbursement by diagnosis-related groups: legal and ethical implications for nursing homes. Kapp MB J Long Term Care Adm; 1986; 14(3):20-6. PubMed ID: 10311727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Life, liberty and death. Annas GJ Health Manage Q; 1990; 12(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 10103996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Case study: denying admission of a suicidal patient to a nursing home. Baumrucker SJ; Stolick M; Morris GM; Sheldon JE Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2004; 21(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 15055517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Nursing homes seek advance directives. Eubanks P Hospitals; 1990 Nov; 64(22):52-4. PubMed ID: 2227901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Living wills made under the Colorado Medical Treatment Decision Act and do not resuscitate orders for hospital and nursing home patients: a comparison. Haggerty DM; Abrams FR Colo Med; 1987 Jun; 84(10):203-5. PubMed ID: 3608382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The Cruzan case: who has the right to decide? Johnson SH Health Prog; 1989 Nov; 70(9):22-5. PubMed ID: 10313361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Who is wise enough to decide who dies? Boyle JF Internist; 1988 Apr; 29(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 10287123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment. Scofield GR Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Program builds a legal and ethical basis for deciding when to withhold treatment. Wagner L Mod Healthc; 1988 Jul; 18(30):56-7. PubMed ID: 10288184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Malpractice by committee. Can Doct; 1987 May; 53(5):GP22. PubMed ID: 10282055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The living will in action. Hirsh HL Nurs Homes; 1986; 35(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 10284045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Finding agreement to limit life-sustaining treatment for children who are in state custody. Savage T; Michalak DR Pediatr Nurs; 2001; 27(6):594-7. PubMed ID: 12024533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The right to refuse medical treatment: where there is a right, there ought to be a remedy. Wilborn SE North KY Law Rev; 1998; 25(4):649-73. PubMed ID: 16437814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. To be or not to be. The vexing question in medical ethics. Panel discussion. Anderson DS; Anglemeyer WC; Sausman R; Reynolds R; Reynolds B; Primer S Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1988 Mar; 32(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 10286528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Bishops' response to Act on Rights of Terminally Ill. Brodeur D Health Prog; 1987; 68(1):22-5, 94. PubMed ID: 10280352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution. Mazzeo KE Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law. Goldmeier KE MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. NJ court backs patient's right to refuse care; ruling parallels brief submitted by ACP chapter. Swick T Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1987; 7(7):2. PubMed ID: 10283689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]