These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10279314)

  • 1. Nurse appraisal in practice.
    Anderson G; Barnett J
    Health Serv J; 1986 Oct; 96(5023):1420-1. PubMed ID: 10279314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Failed criteria: a verdict on the job evaluation document.
    Jacob D
    Nurs Times; 1977 Oct; 73(41):1579. PubMed ID: 928090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Staff appraisal: trying to do better.
    Walton M
    Nurs Times; 1985 Jul 10-16; 81(28):30-1. PubMed ID: 3848848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Every which way you lose.
    Snell J
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):42. PubMed ID: 2395710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Failing to make the grade.
    Pinel C
    Nursing (Lond); 1991 Jan 10-23; 4(26):32-3. PubMed ID: 1852307
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Logjam in the regions.
    Tattam A
    Nurs Times; 1990 Aug 29-Sep 4; 86(35):43. PubMed ID: 2395711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The nurse executive defendant.
    Feutz SA
    J Nurs Adm; 1988 Jan; 18(1):5-6, 12. PubMed ID: 3339458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health authority performance indicators.
    Barnes KS
    Hosp Health Serv Rev; 1984 May; 80(3):118-9. PubMed ID: 10266919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance rating.
    Noak J
    Nurs Stand; 1999 Mar 31-Apr 6; 13(28):23. PubMed ID: 10418470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In response to: Kahya E. (2006) A revision of a job evaluation system. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56(3), 314-324.
    Ransom E
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Dec; 60(5):570-1; author reply 572-3. PubMed ID: 17973721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
    Martin V
    Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring down: PRP pitfalls.
    Kline R
    Health Visit; 1993 Jun; 66(6):222. PubMed ID: 8344838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Staff appraisal & performance review--practical perspectives.
    Walton M
    Health Serv Manpow Rev; 1982 Feb; 7(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 10254454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Staff performance.
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2015 Sep; 22(5):19. PubMed ID: 26309010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Seminar on nursing administration. Quality assurance in nursing: process aspect].
    Park SA
    Taehan Kanho; 1987 Sep; 26(3):37-40. PubMed ID: 3657050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How should the government check nurses are fit to practise?
    Duffin C
    Nurs Stand; 2006 Jul 26-Aug 1; 20(46):14-5. PubMed ID: 16898188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing performance.
    Ellis J
    Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2008 Apr; 15(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 18444380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What happens when a complaint is received about a nurse's practice?
    Mackay H
    Nurs BC; 2001 Jun; 33(3):15-8. PubMed ID: 12152566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Staff development and performance review: a case of cart before the horse?
    Thompson DJC
    Hosp Health Serv Rev; 1978 Jan; 74(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 10306256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oh no--not appraisal again.
    Caddell V
    Health Serv Manpow Rev; 1984 Feb; 9(4):16-9. PubMed ID: 10265167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.