These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Clarifying who decides. Hollister DC Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10103559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Life and death after Cruzan: recent developments in right to die cases. Elliott SJ Healthspan; 1992; 9(7):12-6. PubMed ID: 10121439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution. Mazzeo KE Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right-to-die issues in Minnesota. Klein JE Minn Med; 1991 Apr; 74(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 1875875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The life of a bioethicist. Rog M Minn Med; 1995 Feb; 78(2):6-7, 50. PubMed ID: 7891652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law. Goldmeier KE MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Foregoing life-sustaining treatment: what are the legal limits in an aging society? Rothenberg KH Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Jan; (143):7-34. PubMed ID: 10108913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan. Garvey MA J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ohio's new law: what the durable power statute can do ... and what it can't. Carlson RA Ohio Med; 1990 Jun; 86(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 2367049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to refuse medical treatment: where there is a right, there ought to be a remedy. Wilborn SE North KY Law Rev; 1998; 25(4):649-73. PubMed ID: 16437814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome. Brindisi TJ Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogate decision-making legislation: the next frontier in life-sustaining treatment policy. Portman RM J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Oct; 24(10):311-9. PubMed ID: 10114557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Wrongful living": resuscitation as tortious interference with a patient's right to give informed refusal. Knapp WC; Hamilton F North KY Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):253-76. PubMed ID: 16044603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client. Harner SR Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [From case to case: making a decision about life]. Messer M; Weber M Pflege Z; 2008 May; 61(5):290-1. PubMed ID: 18552120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment. Scofield GR Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Past and present. Closing the circle on the right to die. Linenthal AJ Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1993; 56(1):46. PubMed ID: 8434045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]