182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10280624)
1. Reflections on biased selection and future directions.
Ginsburg PB
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1985; 6():275-80. PubMed ID: 10280624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of prior-year health expenditures on health coverage plan choice.
Ellis RP
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1985; 6():149-70. PubMed ID: 10311892
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Compensating for biased selection in health insurance.
Luft HS
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(4):566-91. PubMed ID: 3821695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Point-of-service: options that may help attract HMO members.
Brightbill T
Contract Healthc; 1988 Feb; ():25. PubMed ID: 10290604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Persistence in the choice of health plans.
Neipp J; Zeckhauser R
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1985; 6():47-72. PubMed ID: 10280626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Are "choice plans" too good to be true?
Frabotta J
Bus Health; 1989 May; 7(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 10293142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subsidy equilibrium and multiple-option insurance markets.
Cave JA
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1985; 6():27-45. PubMed ID: 10280623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Selection and the competitive standing of health plans in a multiple-choice, multiple-insurer market.
Price JR; Mays JW
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1985; 6():127-47. PubMed ID: 10280618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adverse selection in a large, multiple-option health benefits program: a case study of the California public employees' retirement system.
Luft HS; Trauner JB; Maerki SC
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1985; 6():197-229. PubMed ID: 10280620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confused consumers. When given options, what health plans do consumers choose--and why?
Blankenau R
Hosp Health Netw; 1993 Jul; 67(13):31-2. PubMed ID: 8513367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing health care cost by demarketing benefits.
Reddy AC
Health Mark Q; 1989; 6(4):137-45. PubMed ID: 10296126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Employer-sponsored health insurance: what's offered; what's chosen?
Bucci M; Grant R
Mon Labor Rev; 1995 Oct; 118(10):38-44. PubMed ID: 10152800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tipping the balance. A few adjustments in strategy will help employers realize savings with HMOs.
Wagner D
Bus Health; 1988 Apr; 5(6):22-3, 26-7. PubMed ID: 10286737
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlling adverse selection.
Drummer K
Health Cost Manage; 1985; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10273752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. R.J. Reynolds' HMO update given NAEHMO conferees.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Jul; 32(1):80. PubMed ID: 10304827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An analysis of the choice of health benefits plans.
Juba DA; Lave JR; Shaddy J
Inquiry; 1980; 17(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 6445335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Employers, HMOs agree on data form.
DiBlase D
Bus Insur; 1986 Dec; 20(50):1, 45. PubMed ID: 10279601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Group Health study dispels myth of risk skimming, helps revamp rates.
Bartels-Rabb L
Contract Healthc; 1988; ():11. PubMed ID: 10290576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of health practices in HMO selection bias: a confirmatory study.
Feldman R; Finch M; Dowd B
Inquiry; 1989; 26(3):381-7. PubMed ID: 2529215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marketing creates unexpected Champus enrollment growth.
Kight D
Contract Healthc; 1988; ():7-8. PubMed ID: 10290639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
