These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10280930)
21. Physician unions: any doctor can join, but who can bargain collectively? Sobal LV; Hepner JO Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1990; 35(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 10106916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Will this antitrust victory backfire on doctors? Thomas MC Med Econ; 1988 Aug; 65(16):62-4, 66, 68-9 passim. PubMed ID: 10288446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Competition among physicians. Avoiding anticompetitive activities. Oliver D Consultant; 1988 Dec; 28(12):60-1, 68, 73. PubMed ID: 10290553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. M.D. Physicians of Southwest Louisiana, Inc.; analysis to aid public comment--FTC. Proposed consent agreement. Fed Regist; 1998 Jun; 63(121):34423-4. PubMed ID: 10180296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Physicians under siege: the Federal Trade Commission versus the physicians of St. Francis Hospital. Rosen BF Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):73-6. PubMed ID: 10290186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. IPA dissolves to settle charges of price-fixing. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1991 Oct; 21(40):26. PubMed ID: 10114172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Federal antitrust laws and hospital concerns. Gramza M; Gire M OH; 1984 Jan; 28(1):11-5, 22. PubMed ID: 10264419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Physician organizing: a convergence of interests. Erf SD Manag Care Interface; 1999 Jun; 12(6):96-9. PubMed ID: 10538466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Physicians and PPOs: antitrust lessons from Maricopa. Finke RF; Gary M Hosp Med Staff; 1983 Jul; 12(7):10-5. PubMed ID: 10278175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Pharmaceutical patent settlements: the antitrust risks. Balto DA Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):321-41. PubMed ID: 11824464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Independent physicians organizations: are they a solution? Kopit WG Internist; 1987 Jul; 28(6):12-3, 16. PubMed ID: 10282657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Extent antitrust laws apply to hospital staff appointments is questionable. Horty J Mod Healthc; 1985 Apr; 15(9):112. PubMed ID: 10271626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Antitrust and the credentialing of physicians. Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 10284308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Antitrust and hospital peer review. Blumstein JF; Sloan FA Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):7-92. PubMed ID: 10295966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The development of preferred provider organizations and its antitrust implications. Maram BS J Med Pract Manage; 1985 Oct; 1(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10281825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Preferred provider organizations: an antitrust warning. Sandler AL Group Pract J; 1987; 36(6):41-2, 44. PubMed ID: 10284861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Trustee involvement in staff appointments: an antitrust Rx. Klein RM Mich Hosp; 1987 May; 23(5):31-3. PubMed ID: 10281882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The antitrust perspective on health industry competition. Miller FH J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 12(1):128-48. PubMed ID: 10296433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Competition and antitrust enforcement in the changing pharmaceutical marketplace. Whitener MD Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 10342998 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]