195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10281011)
21. Governmental paternalism and the quality of medical care.
Timmis GC
Appl Cardiol; 1986; 14(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 10274937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. PSRO hospital review: final rule.
Fed Regist; 1979 Jun; 44(108):32073-91. PubMed ID: 10273140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Healthcare law firms find malpractice verdict 'chilling'.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1991 Jan; 21(2):39. PubMed ID: 10108473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it!
Chenen AR
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: a personal opinion.
Pearson JH
Hawaii Med J; 1987 Aug; 46(8):310-1. PubMed ID: 3667257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Federal regulation and assuring high-quality care.
Kahn KA
Pride Inst J Long Term Home Health Care; 1989; 8(2):18-24. PubMed ID: 10293490
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Malpractice implications of pressure ulcers.
Taylor JS
Adv Wound Care; 1994 Sep; 7(5):43-4, 46, 48-9. PubMed ID: 7889251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. You and the PRO.
Rheney JW
J S C Med Assoc; 1990 Jul; 86(7):406-10. PubMed ID: 2398739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review: is it working?
Investor Owned Hosp Rev; 1976 Feb; 9(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 10273142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Liability seen as side effect of substandard-care rules.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1989 Mar; 19(9):46. PubMed ID: 10303274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Proposed Medicare regulations: denial of payment for substandard quality care and review of beneficiary complaints.
Cummins JR
Ky Hosp Mag; 1989; 6(4):22, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10304158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Controlling the quality of Uncle Sam's drugs.
Hecht A
FDA Consum; 1977 May; 11(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 10316531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Peer review organizations: what is the record so far?
Caldwell JR
J Fla Med Assoc; 1986 Jun; 73(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 3723104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Medical standard of care jurisprudence as evolutionary process: implications under managed care.
Markowitz C
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 2(1):59-88. PubMed ID: 12664937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Perspectives. DRGs and quality of care.
Wash Rep Med Health; 1985 Nov; 39(46):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10311364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Disciplining physicians: what every physician and health care administrator needs to know about the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Goldberg MK
J Med Pract Manage; 2000; 16(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 14608780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: reporting practitioner malpractice and discipline.
McNair RM
Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):10-8. PubMed ID: 10284642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Who's on the malpractice hook if your office is mismanaged?
Crane M
Med Econ; 1999 Sep; 76(17):61-2, 65-6, 68. PubMed ID: 10558233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A 20-year experience with malpractice screening panels.
Kridelbaugh WW; Palmisano DJ
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1997 May; 82(5):21-3. PubMed ID: 10167808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Statutory protection for peer review committees--can it be waived?
Berg RN
J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 Jul; 77(7):586-7. PubMed ID: 3171431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
