401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10281128)
1. Productivity monitoring of the non-technical staff.
Fodor J; Salvekar A
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 10281128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Making the performance assessment process work for you.
Lombardi DN
Adm Radiol; 1988 Apr; 7(4):14-6, 18. PubMed ID: 10287386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Getting a handle on performance measurement.
Scott S
Adm Radiol; 1988 Mar; 7(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 10286583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Grass roots productivity: productivity managed by the productive.
Suskin S; Gagnon N
Radiol Manage; 1986 Jul; 8(3):57-61. PubMed ID: 10278760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A method of work performance appraisal at the Pediatric Department in Levoca].
Ivicic L; Kacejová R
Cesk Pediatr; 1987 Mar; 42(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 3581272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A systems approach to motivational program development.
Dubicki R
Radiol Technol; 1980; 52(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 7455063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Guidelines for evaluating department managers.
Schoenhard WC
Hosp Prog; 1978 Oct; 59(10):60-2. PubMed ID: 689658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating productivity and budgeting staff.
Schwartz HW
Radiol Manage; 1989; 11(3):39-43. PubMed ID: 10294231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance appraisal blues: who should get the pink slip?
Riordan J
Respir Ther; 1981; 11(6):107-8, 110-11. PubMed ID: 10253943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance standards: how to assess and address human resource needs.
Vann B; Clinton M
Radiol Manage; 1988; 10(3):63-6. PubMed ID: 10288306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An introduction to productivity for the radiology manager.
Conway JB
Radiol Manage; 1980 Apr; 2(3):3-12. PubMed ID: 10246479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A program for technologist rejection rate using the home computer.
Cottrell GA
Radiol Manage; 1985 Sep; 7(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10281498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
Benedetto AR
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance evaluation of radiologic technologists: a method for improving the communicative process.
Kettlehake JE; Malott JC
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10288781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Employees help to define their jobs.
Olmos S
Hospitals; 1979 Jun; 53(12):79-81. PubMed ID: 447251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning to work with cliques in your department.
Heriard JB
Radiol Manage; 1984 Jun; 6(3):24-7. PubMed ID: 10267087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Participative management. Harnessing people power.
Boissoneau R
Adm Radiol; 1988 Oct; 7(10):30-2, 34-5. PubMed ID: 10290288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How formal appraisal systems work.
Pucilo NP
Respir Ther; 1984; 14(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10265552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lack of performance: the top reasons for terminating healthcare employees.
McKinnies RC; Collins SK; Collins KS; Matthews E
Radiol Manage; 2010; 32(3):44-7. PubMed ID: 22276379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiology department study leads to improved productivity.
Hill NH; Tanverdi C
Hospitals; 1981 Apr; 55(8):68-9. PubMed ID: 7203432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
