286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10281323)
1. Right to die: an update.
Sherman T
J Healthc Prot Manage; 1987; 3(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 10281323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to die.
Alschuler AW
New Law J; 1991 Nov; 141(6530):1637-8. PubMed ID: 16145808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia.
Davidson SI
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment.
Hayman S
Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Right to die": an update.
Weyhing RL; Sullivan MJ
Mich Hosp; 1985 Jun; 21(6):15-7. PubMed ID: 10271591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Aspects of the dilemma: when and how should treatment be withheld or withdrawn?
Frelick RW
Del Med J; 1989 Jun; 61(6):305-7. PubMed ID: 2753191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Borrowed lessons: the role of ethical distinctions in framing law on life-sustaining treatment.
Capron AM
Ariz State Law J; 1984; 1984(4):647-60. PubMed ID: 16184674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The patient who wants to die: what to do when rights collide.
Gerber PC
Physicians Manage; 1987 Jun; 27(6):75-8, 83-4. PubMed ID: 10282436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there a right to die? Now the Supreme Court may decide if care can be halted.
Gest T; Burke S
US News World Rep; 1989 Dec; 107(23):35-7. PubMed ID: 10296506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Need for clear and convincing evidence of a patient's wishes before artificial nutrition and hydration may be withdrawn.
Brushwood DB
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1990 Dec; 47(12):2720-2. PubMed ID: 2278289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical issues at the end of life.
Young EW
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1998; 9(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 16528859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no?
O'Brien EJ
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
Peters PG
Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How to document refusal of procedures to sustain life.
Murray CD; Birn SW
Provider; 1986 Oct; 12(10):39-40. PubMed ID: 10279110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing the rules on dying.
Gest T
US News World Rep; 1990 Jul; 109(2):22, 24. PubMed ID: 10105550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A ''minor'' decision: right to die or manslaughter?
Baumrucker SJ; Morris GM; Stolick M; Vandekieft G
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2010 Sep; 27(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 20693520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan.
Garvey MA
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Financial penalties for failing to honor patient wishes to refuse treatment.
Gasner MR
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11():499-520. PubMed ID: 16047426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Right to die legislation: an experience to be avoided in Canada?
Somfai B
CHAC Rev; 1983 Jun; 11(2):8-13. PubMed ID: 10263131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
