These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10281336)

  • 21. A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 10292421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Medical peer review under legal knife.
    Kosterlitz J
    Natl J (Wash); 1988 Mar; 20(13):820. PubMed ID: 10286588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exclusive contracts and hospital privileges--the physician's perspective.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 10285826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radiology v. neurology: civil war over CT scanning in VA's Shenandoah Valley.
    Miles JJ
    Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(15):5-8. PubMed ID: 10282649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What competition can do to peer review.
    Holoweiko M
    Med Econ; 1985 Aug; 62(17):122-7, 131-9. PubMed ID: 10278339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dodging the bullet: avoiding conspiracy claims in professional staff disputes.
    Piché GR
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1988; 33(4):531-42. PubMed ID: 10290103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Coastal Neuro-Psychiatric broadens state action exemption protection for hospital credentialing decisions.
    Lipsetts PG
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10278410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hospital medical staff privileges and antitrust: an overview.
    Weissburg C; Waxman JM
    Conn Med; 1982 Jul; 46(7):393-6. PubMed ID: 7116840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hospitals, medical staff privileges, and antitrust.
    Kaser DL
    Mich Hosp; 1983 Mar; 19(3):7-12. PubMed ID: 10258819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Staff privileges and antitrust laws.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1982 Sep; 56(17):76-8. PubMed ID: 7095791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oregon case raises questions about peer review.
    Davis CD
    Healthtexas; 1989 Jan; 44(7):7. PubMed ID: 10313055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perspectives. Doctors fight for staff privileges.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Jun; 38(23):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10310636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hyde decision affirms current practice.
    Jones KB
    Pa Med; 1984 May; 87(5):22. PubMed ID: 6539895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hospital medical staff privileges and antitrust: an overview.
    Weissburg C; Waxman JM
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(6):48-51. PubMed ID: 10253024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The physician and antitrust.
    Graff D
    Ohio State Med J; 1986 Feb; 82(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 3960456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Antitrust law and the medical staff.
    Holthaus D
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Credentialing sparks antitrust suits.
    Stoltzfus WL
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):190, 192. PubMed ID: 10265428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Peer review, privileges: MDs fear legal tangles.
    Koska MT
    Trustee; 1990 Feb; 43(2):19. PubMed ID: 10104264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hospital antitrust suit settled.
    Am Med News; 1981 Nov 20-27; 24(44):9. PubMed ID: 10253695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High court relaxes exclusive-contract antitrust rules in Hyde.
    Reed TJ; Allen HS
    Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):74-9. PubMed ID: 6724551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.