These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10281935)
1. Laws vary on use of peer review records in litigation. Berliner MC Provider; 1987 May; 13(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10281935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records. Peterson RN Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal issues concerning peer review documents. Dunn LJ; Holbrook RF Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 10252576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Washington State Supreme Court protects quality review committee records. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 10265237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The latest word on confidentiality of peer review. Cronan CJ J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Dec; 96(12):491-3. PubMed ID: 9879179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. VA hospital documents sought: suit threatens peer review privacy. Am Med News; 1979 Dec; 22(47):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10244813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital sued for corporate negligence, court rules on discovery of records. Mudron MD Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):7-8. PubMed ID: 10278590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Discoverability and admissibility of medical staff committee records: a state-by-state analysis. Roach WH Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 10252569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer Review. Can the Board of Medical Practice subpoena your files? Mitchell LE; Bunde DP; Struthers MS; Wraspir KL; Moos RE Minn Med; 2000 Nov; 83(11):55-6. PubMed ID: 11126484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Discovery and admissibility: the use of peer review reports before and during trial. Kucera WR AANA J; 1981 Aug; 49(4):437-8. PubMed ID: 7282284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical malpractice litigation: the discoverability and use of hospitals' quality assurance committee records. Holbrook RF; Dunn LJ Med Malpract Cost Containment J; 1979 Jul; 1(2):109-31. PubMed ID: 10243995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discoverability of peer review committee records: an update. Roach WH; Chernoff SN Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Mar; 4(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 10265592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review records: Canadian laws must be updated. Ferguson CG Dimens Health Serv; 1985; 62(9):16. PubMed ID: 4076627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act on peer review. Strama B Healthspan; 1990 Oct; 7(9):12-7. PubMed ID: 10107396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. State access to peer review records: a clash of public policy. Singer AR; Willett DE Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):11-6. PubMed ID: 10294742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1992; 13(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 10126149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The peer review privilege: what documents are protected from discovery in litigation. Smart CM Mo Med; 1998 May; 95(5):205-6. PubMed ID: 9604664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. They just don't get it. Hackney VH; Le Grand AC Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]