These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10282436)
1. The patient who wants to die: what to do when rights collide. Gerber PC Physicians Manage; 1987 Jun; 27(6):75-8, 83-4. PubMed ID: 10282436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Right to die: an update. Sherman T J Healthc Prot Manage; 1987; 3(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 10281323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Is there a right to die? Now the Supreme Court may decide if care can be halted. Gest T; Burke S US News World Rep; 1989 Dec; 107(23):35-7. PubMed ID: 10296506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. But, why do we shoot horses?: an analysis of the right to die and euthanasia. Davidson SI N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1994; 12(1):115-61. PubMed ID: 16086499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing the rules on dying. Gest T US News World Rep; 1990 Jul; 109(2):22, 24. PubMed ID: 10105550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Financial penalties for failing to honor patient wishes to refuse treatment. Gasner MR St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11():499-520. PubMed ID: 16047426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Refusing life-sustaining treatment: can we just say no? O'Brien EJ Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 67(3):677-706. PubMed ID: 16044604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1990 Jul; (137):7-38. PubMed ID: 10105837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The right to die. Alschuler AW New Law J; 1991 Nov; 141(6530):1637-8. PubMed ID: 16145808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A limited right to die. Friedrich O Time; 1990 Jul; 136(2):59. PubMed ID: 10105428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Past and present. Closing the circle on the right to die. Linenthal AJ Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1993; 56(1):46. PubMed ID: 8434045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Developments in foregoing life-sustaining treatment. Scofield GR Healthspan; 1989 Mar; 6(3):3-7. PubMed ID: 10292566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act. Hunt WE Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Borrowed lessons: the role of ethical distinctions in framing law on life-sustaining treatment. Capron AM Ariz State Law J; 1984; 1984(4):647-60. PubMed ID: 16184674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond Cruzan: making life support decisions. Anderson KM; Byrne FD; Robinson RD Indiana Med; 1990 Nov; 83(11):838-41. PubMed ID: 2262678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clarifying who decides. Hollister DC Mich Hosp; 1990 Jan; 26(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10103559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Euthanasia--prescriptions and proscriptions of assistance in dying]. Herranz G Med Klin (Munich); 1994 Apr; 89(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 8015538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment. Dooling RP Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1987 Nov; 9(5):7-30. PubMed ID: 10284752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]