195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10283116)
1. Experts react to rulings on treatment withdrawal.
Health Prog; 1987; 68(6):32, 34, 96. PubMed ID: 10283116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The question of euthanasia.
Nelson JR
Engage Soc Action; 1976 Apr; 4(4):17-18+. PubMed ID: 11663012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Care of the dying: the doctor and euthanasia.
Rizzo R; Yonder J
Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):253-68. PubMed ID: 11662104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent court decisions show wide range of rulings on futility.
Hosp Ethics; 1991; 7(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 10170859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law.
Tarantino LM
Buffalo Law Rev; 1994; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan.
Hirsh HL; Donovan RE
Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Limiting medical treatment: who decides and when.
Chance DW; McRady F; Hester G
Contemp Longterm Care; 1986 Oct; 9(10):76-82. PubMed ID: 10280722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral decisions in medical situations.
Weber LJ
New Cathol World; 1976; 219(1313):214-7. PubMed ID: 11662305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Euthanasia: the physician's liability.
Thurman V
John Marshall J Pract Proced; 1976; 10(1):148-72. PubMed ID: 11661425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal and moral aspects of termination of life-support systems: a discussion.
Loeffelholz JP; Madden MC; Morgan WK; Tooley WH
Respir Care; 1977 Oct; 22(10):1146-56. PubMed ID: 10314821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patients and physicians: who is responsible for what?
Winslade WJ
Contemp Surg; 1978 Nov; 13(5):39-40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 10240003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonfeeding as withdrawal of medical therapy.
Probert W; Carson RA
Death Stud; 1985; 9(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 10272681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Living and dying: a delicate balance.
Robitscher J
Engage Soc Action; 1973 Oct; 1(10):38-53. PubMed ID: 11661037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The withdrawal of treatment: the costs and benefits of guidelines.
Shannon TA
Bioethics Dig; 1978 Apr; 3(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 11660917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. When in doubt, act: Law Reform Survey--Part 2.
Williamson PN
Can Doct; 1980 Jul; 46(7):22-9. PubMed ID: 10247848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What physicians can do regarding decisions about life support.
Raskin D
Del Med J; 1989 Mar; 61(3):169-70. PubMed ID: 2703095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. When physicians balk at futile care: implications of the disability rights laws.
Peters PG
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1997; 91(3):798-864. PubMed ID: 11660527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to die.
Guyther JR
Md State Med J; 1973 Jun; 22(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 11661024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Euthanasia: a reflection on the doctor and the hospital.
Gill JJ
Cathol Mind; 1974 Oct; 72(1286):25-30. PubMed ID: 11661137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The legacy of the Schiavo case: the atmosphere around end-of-life decisions has changed.
Shannon TA
America (NY); 2005 Jun 6-13; 192(20):17-9. PubMed ID: 16175697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
