BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10284355)

  • 1. Program worth a second look.
    Profiles Hosp Mark; 1987; (28):10-3. PubMed ID: 10284355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Change the way you look.
    Early P
    Profiles Healthc Mark; 1990; (39):14-9. PubMed ID: 10105284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost containment in surgery: the nature of the problem.
    Ravitch MM
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1980 Apr; 65(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 10316958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marketing ensures success of maternity care program.
    Lee JM
    Hospitals; 1980 Dec; 54(24):91-2, 94. PubMed ID: 7429474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Economic aspects of managing surgical departments].
    Pastorová J
    Cesk Zdrav; 1980 Mar; 28(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 7363362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Births jump 11% with new look.
    Gogno A
    Profiles Healthc Mark; 1989 Jul; (35):24-6. PubMed ID: 10294210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Day surgery versus inpatient surgery: a cost comparison.
    Karpman S
    Health Manage Forum; 1983; 4(2):54-63. PubMed ID: 10317324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospitals fear Medicare payment changes may cut outpatient surgery reimbursement.
    Baldwin MF
    Mod Healthc; 1987 May; 17(10):32. PubMed ID: 10317894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inpatients consume more resources than outpatients.
    OR Manager; 1989 Mar; 5(3):8. PubMed ID: 10318207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Setting up a day surgery program.
    Hutchison MG
    Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Apr; 56(4):19-21. PubMed ID: 428679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systems emphasizing cost containment in the surgical suite.
    Gilmore JM
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1980 Feb; 1(3):63-7. PubMed ID: 10245174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marketing gives ambulatory surgery units competitive edge.
    Berkowitz E
    Same Day Surg; 1982 Feb; 6(2):13-5. PubMed ID: 10317182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A second chance at life.
    Maier F
    Newsweek; 1988 Sep; 112(11):52-61. PubMed ID: 10302666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgeons living under DRGs.
    Glenn JF
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1986 Jul; 71(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10311593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Limited-resource claims for new purposes].
    Janssen CW
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1981 Jan; 101(1B):107-9. PubMed ID: 7456080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of DRG's on surgical practice.
    Gardner B
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1984 Jul; 159(1):75-6. PubMed ID: 6429873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pricing surgical services.
    Dieter BB
    Top Health Care Financ; 1987; 14(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 3672512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cart requisition form provides cost control for surgical suite.
    Maytum JA
    Hospitals; 1982 Feb; 56(3):46-7. PubMed ID: 7054092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An alternative approach: determining hospital surgical suite charges.
    Skousen CR; Hooper GL
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1981 Dec; 35(12):50-6, 58, 61. PubMed ID: 10317159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Software products help reduce time needed for surgical planning.
    Carter K
    Mod Healthc; 1986 Sep; 16(20):76. PubMed ID: 10278702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.