232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10284641)
1. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: an overview of its immunity provisions.
Miles JJ
Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 10284641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Pugsley SC
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Feb; 23(2):42-52. PubMed ID: 10106379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits.
Purtell DL
Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review/hospital privileges/credentialing.
Springer EW
Leg Med; 1994; ():57-81. PubMed ID: 7830486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Austin v. McNamara: immunity from suit under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Chenen AR
Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 10107512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital credentialing.
Cowan RB; Montgomery CR
J Miss State Med Assoc; 1987 Jan; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 3820289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective physician credentialing. Properly monitoring medical staffs can protect hospitals from liability.
Blaes SM; Knight GE
Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):60-5. PubMed ID: 10107456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: its history, provisions, applications and implications.
Horner SL
Am J Law Med; 1990; 16(4):455-98. PubMed ID: 2102058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
Pugsley SC
Leg Med; 1990; ():217-42. PubMed ID: 2130197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review immunity for bad faith activities. Patrick v. Burget fails to provide an answer.
Trankina TJ
J Med Assoc Ga; 1988 Sep; 77(9):724-6. PubMed ID: 3225551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986].
Cruz ML
Bol Asoc Med P R; 1990 Nov; 82(11):501-4. PubMed ID: 2076141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical staff credentialing: a prescription for reducing antitrust liability.
Peters BM; Maneval WC
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):120-33. PubMed ID: 1895761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review, privileges: MDs fear legal tangles.
Koska MT
Hospitals; 1989 Dec; 63(23):28-9, 31, 33. PubMed ID: 2583696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the future of peer review.
Trostorff DL
Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 10106574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal immunity for peer-review programs.
Pedersen AB
N Engl J Med; 1989 Jul; 321(4):265. PubMed ID: 2747768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic credentialing. The buck stops here.
Paryani SB; Goldman N; Harty-Golder B
J Fla Med Assoc; 1994 Dec; 81(12):839-42. PubMed ID: 7861112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Economic credentialing moves from the hospital to managed care.
Blum JD
J Health Care Finance; 1995; 22(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 8528826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health care as a business.
Hirsh HL
Leg Med; 1980; ():275-82. PubMed ID: 7421393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Antitrust's recent attack on the peer review practitioner: is the Health Care Quality Improvement Act a viable remedy?
Rifkin AM; Evans GE; Hall GD
Md Med J; 1990 Jan; 39(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 2308484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services: Part III.
Hershey N
Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 May; 5(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 2136667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
