These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10284644)
21. Reflections on the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Scholten MG W V Med J; 1988 May; 84(5):193-4. PubMed ID: 3376472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Implementation of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the future of peer review. Trostorff DL Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):23-31. PubMed ID: 10106574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Facilities still in the dark about Quality Improvement Act. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1988 Oct; 69(8):18, 20. PubMed ID: 10290380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Putting HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) to the test. QRC Advis; 1992 Jul; 8(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 10183677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA). Wecht CH Leg Med; 1991; ():269-85. PubMed ID: 1821897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations. Valiant C Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. HCQIA's grant of immunity: panacea or Pandora's box. Scott C Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Jan; 9(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10116004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months. Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act): CA doctors decide to opt out. Koska MT Hospitals; 1988 Jul; 62(13):56. PubMed ID: 3384420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Court cases testing scope of federal law's peer review immunity. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(34):80. PubMed ID: 10119842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The antitrust laws and the medical peer review process. Hammack JM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():419-50. PubMed ID: 10126945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act: legislative intent and California action. Kadzielski MA Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1988; 21(6):46, 48. PubMed ID: 10291007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Enhanced peer review immunity. Minnesota Medical Association. Minn Med; 1989 Oct; 72(10):593, 595-6. PubMed ID: 2796902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Austin v. McNamara: immunity from suit under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(4):49-51. PubMed ID: 10107512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Federal protection for "good faith" peer review. Prout DM Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1986 Sep; 6(8):8-9. PubMed ID: 10278807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]