330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10285379)
1. Potential liability for institutional review boards and bioethics committees.
Reider A
Home Care Econ; 1987; 1(4):119-21. PubMed ID: 10285379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards and bioethics committees: their role in ensuring ethical home care research.
Cary AH
Home Care Econ; 1987; 1(4):113-8. PubMed ID: 10285378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protection of human subjects; informed consent; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations--FDA. Final rule.
Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(117):28025-9. PubMed ID: 10112215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protection of human subjects; informed consent; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations--FDA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1988 Nov; 53(218):45678-82. PubMed ID: 10290533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of human subjects: Institutional Review Board; report and recommendations of National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(231):56173-98. PubMed ID: 10239683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical lasers and the law.
Norton ML; Norton EV
Leg Med; 1986; ():134-47. PubMed ID: 3312887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards (IRBs) and reproductive medicine: guidelines for compliance.
Cackowski A
J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 10160175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. More tales from institutional review boards.
Neuhauser D
Health Matrix Clevel; 1994; 4(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 10142174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting "human guinea pigs".
Thompson RC
FDA Consum; 1986 Dec-1987 Jan; 20(10):12-5. PubMed ID: 10311766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
Jansson RL
Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. When research turns into liability.
Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA
Health Care (Don Mills); 1989; 31(9):38. PubMed ID: 10296538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Position statement of the AFCR on the issue of regulation of institutional review boards by the FDA.
Clin Res; 1979 Apr; 27(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 10241073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Malpractice by committee.
Can Doct; 1987 May; 53(5):GP22. PubMed ID: 10282055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the risk of legal liability for ethics committees.
Merritt AL
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988; 18(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 3350642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience with boards and commissions concerned with research ethics in the United States.
McCarthy CR
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 128():111-22. PubMed ID: 6634724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations: proposed establishment of regulations.
Fed Regist; 1978 Aug; 43(153):5185-208. PubMed ID: 10237259
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why new human research guidelines raise legal worries.
Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA
Health Care (Don Mills); 1988 Oct; 30(7):62. PubMed ID: 10290076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical battery and failure to obtain informed consent: Illinois court decision suggests potential for IRB liability.
LeBlang TR
IRB; 1995; 17(3):10-1. PubMed ID: 11654268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
