BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10285607)

  • 1. Prospects for increasing the accessibility of MRI.
    Kaufman L; Crooks L; Arakawa M; Hoenninger J; Watts J; Winkler M
    Adm Radiol; 1987 Nov; 6(11):32-4, 36-8. PubMed ID: 10285607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR: profits climb, bad debt drops.
    Wilkinson R
    Hospitals; 1987 Nov; 61(21):58-63. PubMed ID: 3666738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging.
    Harms S
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Aug; 9(8):39, 41-2, 45 passim. PubMed ID: 10106047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equipment leasing. A guide for lessees.
    Stewart D
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Feb; 9(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 10104276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of prospective payment systems on diagnostic imaging services.
    Muilenburg RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Dec; 145(6):1122-3. PubMed ID: 3933289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiology services on a tight budget.
    MacEwan DW
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1980 Jun; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7380875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to buy 1-tesla MR scanner by the numbers.
    Cvitanic O; Kimzey M
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Jun; 19(6):91-4. PubMed ID: 10167773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting methods in radiation oncology. Case level cost determination.
    Sternick E
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Jun; 9(6):58-62, 64. PubMed ID: 10105306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness: radiologic services.
    Lucas SJ
    Ohio State Med J; 1979 May; 75(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 111190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physicians shed light on marketing MR.
    Wilkinson R
    Hospitals; 1987 Nov; 61(21):72, 74. PubMed ID: 3666743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department.
    Glaser SM; Dehn TG
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI vs. angio. A comparison of costs and efficiency.
    Oates M; Hartnell G
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Mar; 13(3):31-3. PubMed ID: 10133611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRI outsourcing: a cost-effective alternative.
    Campbell S
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1996 May; 14(5):13. PubMed ID: 10162336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The how and why of a marketing budget.
    Hughes C; Van Gilse M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Nov; 10(11):51-5. PubMed ID: 10115720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Purchasing medical imaging equipment.
    Gray JE; Morin RL
    Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 2494684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using cost-volume-profit methods to purchase open MRI equipment.
    Landry C; Knox J; Brown B
    Radiol Manage; 1996; 18(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 10154331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Low-osmolality contrast media: good news or bad?
    Evens RG
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 3138706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Costs hinder teleradiography.
    Cherskov M
    Hospitals; 1986 Oct; 60(19):105, 108. PubMed ID: 3758986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bases for cost calculations in x-ray facilities].
    Bossard F
    Radiologe; 1985 Jun; 25(6):284-7. PubMed ID: 4023213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management budgeting for radiographers.
    Gray I
    Radiography; 1986; 52(606):295-8. PubMed ID: 3628747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.