These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10285864)

  • 1. FTC, medical staffs reach agreements.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Feb; 18(6):6. PubMed ID: 10285864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Here comes the FTC again.
    Hunt K
    Med Econ; 1983 Mar; 60(5):32, 37-8, 42 passim. PubMed ID: 10258812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physician agreements to control medical prepayment plans: Federal Trade Commission. Adoption and publication of enforcement policy with respect to physician agreements to control medical prepayment plans.
    Fed Regist; 1981 Oct; 46(192):48982-92. PubMed ID: 10252959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physicians under siege: the Federal Trade Commission versus the physicians of St. Francis Hospital.
    Rosen BF
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):73-6. PubMed ID: 10290186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perspectives. Wakened FTC worries providers.
    Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 Apr; 42(14):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10286492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eleventh Circuit allows state action defense in medical staff antitrust case.
    Miller RD
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Jan; 6(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 10292016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What competition can do to peer review.
    Holoweiko M
    Med Econ; 1985 Aug; 62(17):122-7, 131-9. PubMed ID: 10278339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antitrust and hospital peer review.
    Blumstein JF; Sloan FA
    Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):7-92. PubMed ID: 10295966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The antitrust laws: implications for physician staff privileges.
    Peters ME
    J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1987; 10(2):206-18. PubMed ID: 10286042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient care not enough as defense for provider conduct.
    Hammaker MK
    Provider; 1987 Dec; 13(12):30-1, 40. PubMed ID: 10285093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Denying hospital privileges to non-physicians: does quality of care justify a potential restraint of trade?
    Reindl G
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1988 May; 9(11):7-39. PubMed ID: 10286963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The FTC and provider-controlled PPO price negotiations.
    Miles JJ
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jan; 11(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 10285716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Court: activity must affect Interstate Commerce to invoke Sherman Act.
    Carlson DR
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):7-9. PubMed ID: 10276712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital law: the spiraling cost of litigation.
    Hollowell EE
    South Hosp; 1984; 52(5):66-7. PubMed ID: 10268456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antitrust laws should help NPs.
    Klein CA
    Nurse Pract; 1987 Nov; 12(11):39-40, 45, 48-9. PubMed ID: 3320826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seventh Circuit will deem future antitrust challenges frivolous.
    Rothschild IS
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):5-7. PubMed ID: 10278589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. FTC strives for high profile in health care related reform efforts.
    Cronin C
    Bus Health; 1987 Jun; 4(8):55. PubMed ID: 10282050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Supreme Court, antitrust and the health care field.
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(22):1-14. PubMed ID: 10257142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Courts more likely to dismiss doctors' antitrust suits filed against hospitals.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Jul; 17(14):144. PubMed ID: 10282785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3rd Circuit finds evidence insufficient for antitrust summary judgment.
    Carlson DR
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 10287416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.