443 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10286483)
1. Wilk v. American Medical Association--AMA enjoined from advocating boycott of chiropractors; individual choice endorsed.
Cohen HH
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 10286483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Perspectives. Chiropractors: AMA's bone of contention.
Olson EG
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Apr; 44(14):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10104063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Trade restraint suit filed against AMA.
Med World News; 1983 Aug; 24(15):74. PubMed ID: 10261843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AMA hits FTC intrusion.
Fisher MJ
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1982 Sep; 86(38):1, 22. PubMed ID: 10257624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. AHA, others granted summary judgment in Michigan chiropractor antitrust case.
Mitchell SM
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):1-3. PubMed ID: 10278588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Free choice" as a restraint of trade in American health care delivery and insurance.
Weller CD
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 May; 7(3):5-46. PubMed ID: 10300085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Here comes the FTC again.
Hunt K
Med Econ; 1983 Mar; 60(5):32, 37-8, 42 passim. PubMed ID: 10258812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Antitrust enforcement in health care. Ten years after the AMA suit.
Costilo LB
N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(14):901-4. PubMed ID: 4033726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The AMA's big loss in Congress.
New Physician; 1983; 32(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 10258416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Advertising--a test case.
World Med J; 1983; 30(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 10262599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Should the FTC regulate American medicine?
Rial W
Natl J (Wash); 1982 Sep; 14(37):1576-7. PubMed ID: 10256460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives. Wakened FTC worries providers.
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 Apr; 42(14):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10286492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antitrust law and the physician entrepreneur.
Relman AS
N Engl J Med; 1985 Oct; 313(14):884-5. PubMed ID: 4033717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Antitrust claims separate chiropractors, providers.
Burda D
Hospitals; 1986 Sep; 60(18):34. PubMed ID: 3744338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Permanent injunction order against AMA.
Getzendanner S
JAMA; 1988 Jan; 259(1):81-2. PubMed ID: 3334777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Arizona v. Maricopa County: a stern antitrust warning to healthcare providers.
Halper HR
Healthc Financ Manage; 1982 Oct; 36(10):38-42. PubMed ID: 10315212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lawmakers concur with ACP on key aspects of debate.
Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983; 3(7):3. PubMed ID: 10263084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical peer review under legal knife.
Kosterlitz J
Natl J (Wash); 1988 Mar; 20(13):820. PubMed ID: 10286588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. "We're not ostriches anymore!".
Schutte JE
Med Econ; 1989 Sep; 66(18):131, 135-6, 139. PubMed ID: 10294730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When must hospitals offering "downstream" health care services "cooperate" with their rivals?
Miles JJ
Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jul; 8(15):8-10. PubMed ID: 10271850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
