These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10286963)

  • 21. High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk.
    Halper HR; Kazon PM
    Bus Health; 1988 Jul; 5(9):40-1. PubMed ID: 10288490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Medical staff antitrust decisions examine defenses available to defendants.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Jun; 7(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 10104849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz.
    Chenen AR
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 10292421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of quality of health care considerations in antitrust analysis.
    Kauper TE
    Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):273-340. PubMed ID: 10296906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiology v. neurology: civil war over CT scanning in VA's Shenandoah Valley.
    Miles JJ
    Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(15):5-8. PubMed ID: 10282649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Coastal Neuro-Psychiatric broadens state action exemption protection for hospital credentialing decisions.
    Lipsetts PG
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10278410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Hospitals, medical staff privileges, and antitrust.
    Kaser DL
    Mich Hosp; 1983 Mar; 19(3):7-12. PubMed ID: 10258819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hospital medical staff privileges and antitrust: an overview.
    Weissburg C; Waxman JM
    Conn Med; 1982 Jul; 46(7):393-6. PubMed ID: 7116840
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Staff privileges and antitrust laws.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1982 Sep; 56(17):76-8. PubMed ID: 7095791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Health care and antitrust.
    Heitler G
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 Jan; 6(11):5-35. PubMed ID: 10269565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perspectives. Doctors fight for staff privileges.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Jun; 38(23):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10310636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Antitrust and the credentialing of physicians.
    Miles JJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 10284308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Supreme Court, antitrust and the health care field.
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(22):1-14. PubMed ID: 10257142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Oregon case raises questions about peer review.
    Davis CD
    Healthtexas; 1989 Jan; 44(7):7. PubMed ID: 10313055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical staff privileges: is antitrust a real issue for providers?
    Enders RJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Mar; 40(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 10275454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer review, privileges: MDs fear legal tangles.
    Koska MT
    Trustee; 1990 Feb; 43(2):19. PubMed ID: 10104264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Peer review after Patrick.
    Bierig J
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Jun; 21(6):135-9. PubMed ID: 10287912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hospital medical staff privileges and antitrust: an overview.
    Weissburg C; Waxman JM
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(6):48-51. PubMed ID: 10253024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Antitrust law and the medical staff.
    Holthaus D
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Credentialing sparks antitrust suits.
    Stoltzfus WL
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):190, 192. PubMed ID: 10265428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.