These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
597 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10286963)
21. High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk. Halper HR; Kazon PM Bus Health; 1988 Jul; 5(9):40-1. PubMed ID: 10288490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical staff antitrust decisions examine defenses available to defendants. Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Jun; 7(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 10104849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A tale of four cases: Patrick, Bolt, Mitchell, and Oltz. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 10292421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The role of quality of health care considerations in antitrust analysis. Kauper TE Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):273-340. PubMed ID: 10296906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Radiology v. neurology: civil war over CT scanning in VA's Shenandoah Valley. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(15):5-8. PubMed ID: 10282649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Coastal Neuro-Psychiatric broadens state action exemption protection for hospital credentialing decisions. Lipsetts PG Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10278410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Antitrust and the credentialing of physicians. Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 10284308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The Supreme Court, antitrust and the health care field. Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(22):1-14. PubMed ID: 10257142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Oregon case raises questions about peer review. Davis CD Healthtexas; 1989 Jan; 44(7):7. PubMed ID: 10313055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Medical staff privileges: is antitrust a real issue for providers? Enders RJ Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Mar; 40(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 10275454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]