These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10287394)

  • 1. Statements from the field. Massachusetts business associations discuss the pros and cons of mandating health benefits.
    Bus Health; 1988 May; 5(7):14-6, 18. PubMed ID: 10287394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Massachusetts' universal health plan: who will pay the bill?
    Polzer K
    Bus Health; 1990 Apr; 8(4):48-50, 52, 54-8. PubMed ID: 10104329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandated health benefits--pro/con split along familiar lines.
    Herrmann J
    Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 10293499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Compulsory employee benefits: pro and con.
    Bresch JE; Krebs FJ
    Assoc Manage; 1989 Apr; 41(4):86-91. PubMed ID: 10292899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will mandated benefits tie down employers?
    Bus Health; 1988 May; 5(7):8-9. PubMed ID: 10287402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The real price of mandating health benefits.
    Wilensky GR
    Bus Health; 1989 Mar; 7(3):32-5. PubMed ID: 10293131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Business should work to defeat bill to extend health coverage.
    Bales SA
    Bus Insur; 1985 Sep; 19(38):33. PubMed ID: 10273697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Industry confronts expensive mandated health benefits bills.
    Weinstein J
    Restaurants Inst; 1989 Sep; 99(24):24. PubMed ID: 10295744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Politics and health care mingle in Massachusetts.
    Mercure S; Pell K
    Bus Health; 1988 May; 5(7):10, 12-3. PubMed ID: 10287393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. COBRA takes bite out of business sector.
    Powills S
    Hospitals; 1986 Aug; 60(16):42. PubMed ID: 3733044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mandated coverage: an employer debate.
    Rasmussen B
    Bus Health; 1987 Apr; 4(6):12-4. PubMed ID: 10281225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On Dukakis.
    Gradison WD
    Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1988; 21(5):20. PubMed ID: 10302788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandated benefits: good intentions, but a bad idea.
    Klein JA
    Healthspan; 1988 Jun; 5(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 10288657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No future guarantees for self-insured plans.
    Feezor A
    Bus Health; 1987 Apr; 4(6):16-9. PubMed ID: 10281226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. COBRA changes.
    Gonser G
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2009; 58(1):9. PubMed ID: 19526908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ensuring care. Minimal insurance coverage has pros, cons.
    Benko LB
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Mar; 35(13):30. PubMed ID: 15807097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Massachusetts means to employers.
    Hill FP
    Health Cost Manage; 1988; 5(3):17-21. PubMed ID: 10288362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Northeast Department ILGWU Welfare Fund v. Teamsters Local no. 229 Welfare Fund: an end to the escape clause as a method of coordinating health benefits under ERISA?
    O'Connell LJ
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1987; 3():329-39. PubMed ID: 10282312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Washington report: attention on mandated benefits to improve access to health care.
    Lewin ME
    J Med Pract Manage; 1988; 4(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 10288966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unions' views vary on mandated benefits, but not on access to care.
    Ignagni K
    Bus Health; 1987 Feb; 4(4):54-5. PubMed ID: 10280669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.