407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10287400)
21. Wake up call on mandatory insurance.
Schwartz RM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1990 May; 13(5):25-6. PubMed ID: 10113211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Industry confronts expensive mandated health benefits bills.
Weinstein J
Restaurants Inst; 1989 Sep; 99(24):24. PubMed ID: 10295744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Public, private sector options to cover uninsured workers.
Wilensky GR
Bus Health; 1987 Jan; 4(3):42-3. PubMed ID: 10301240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Compulsory employee benefits: pro and con.
Bresch JE; Krebs FJ
Assoc Manage; 1989 Apr; 41(4):86-91. PubMed ID: 10292899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Are mandated benefits the answer?
Reinhardt UE
Health Manage Q; 1988; 10(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 10286675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Massachusetts' universal health plan: who will pay the bill?
Polzer K
Bus Health; 1990 Apr; 8(4):48-50, 52, 54-8. PubMed ID: 10104329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Kennedy's new tack.
Kosterlitz J
Natl J (Wash); 1987 Mar; 19(11):608-11. PubMed ID: 10280678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. How to close the health care gap.
Faltermayer E
Fortune; 1990 May; 121(11):123, 126, 130 passim. PubMed ID: 10104517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Mandated health benefits--pro/con split along familiar lines.
Herrmann J
Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 10293499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Perspectives on national health insurance and rehabilitation.
Dorken H
Annu Rev Rehabil; 1980; 1():13-54. PubMed ID: 7186295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Stresses cost curbs and private sector role in natl. health ins. plan.
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1979 Mar; 83(12):27. PubMed ID: 10240931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Massachusetts legislation: a model for other states or a costly mistake?
Lipson DJ
Bus Health; 1988 Aug; 5(10):48-9. PubMed ID: 10288831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Helping the uninsured employed.
Friedman E
Med World News; 1986 May; 27(9):41-2. PubMed ID: 10276890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Massachusetts takes unique approach.
Danielson DA
Mich Hosp; 1988 Jun; 24(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 10287987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Seeking the cure.
Kosterlitz J
Natl J (Wash); 1990 Mar; 22(12):708-14. PubMed ID: 10106511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Exhausting alternatives. There are disadvantages to relying on the states, but many feel forced to take aggressive steps to cover the uninsured.
Merritt RE; Demkovich L
Health Manage Q; 1991; 13(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10110248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Retiree medical benefit plans and the impact of the bankruptcy filing of LTV Corp.
Melbinger MS
Employee Relat Law J; 1987; 12(4):641-62. PubMed ID: 10301492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS). Withdrawal of proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1981 Dec; 46(241):61299. PubMed ID: 10253703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Implementation of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services; proposed amendment No. 3--Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Fed Regist; 1979 Oct; 44(211):62295-6. PubMed ID: 10244086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The regulatory obstacles posed by self-insurance.
Woodyard WH; Foster SD
Bus Health; 1986; 3(3):24-6. PubMed ID: 10275289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
