These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1028771)
1. A legislative solution to the problem of physician discipline. Edelman J Hosp Med Staff; 1976 Mar; 5(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 1028771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sanctions and recidivism: an evaluation of physician discipline by state medical boards. Grant D; Alfred KC J Health Polit Policy Law; 2007 Oct; 32(5):867-85. PubMed ID: 17855720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Report on a flawed "report card": the public citizens ranking of medical licensing boards. Treffert DA; Johnson SE WMJ; 2005 Feb; 104(2):11-6. PubMed ID: 15856734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Model statute pertaining to disciplinary action against physicians. Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Nov; 6(11):23-4. PubMed ID: 739820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal mechanisms for dealing with the disabled physician in Maryland: partnership between the Medical Society and the State Commission on Medical Discipline. Berman JI Md State Med J; 1976 Feb; 25(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 131886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Disciplinary action against physicians: who is likely to get disciplined? Khaliq AA; Dimassi H; Huang CY; Narine L; Smego RA Am J Med; 2005 Jul; 118(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 15989912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concentrating on the problem physician: perspectives in medical discipline. Galusha BL N Y State J Med; 1989 Apr; 89(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 2733875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical-legal problems of Illinois physicians. Medical Practice Act. Pfeifer FM IMJ Ill Med J; 1969 Mar; 135(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 4388413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. State legislation for physician's assistants. A review and analysis. Dean WJ Health Serv Rep; 1973 Jan; 88(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 4405638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Acupuncture and the law. Rozovsky LE Can Hosp; 1973 Jun; 50(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 4779805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Health care reform and competing visions of medical care: antitrust and state provider cooperation legislation. Blumstein JF Cornell Law Rev; 1994 Sep; 79(6):1459-506. PubMed ID: 10141441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Insuring competence and improving discipline through the Medical Practice Act. Morton WJ J Med Assoc Ga; 1976 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 1245798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A fresh approach to discipline. IMJ Ill Med J; 1987 Sep; 172(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 2889710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review is in the profession's best interest. White ER J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(5):34-7. PubMed ID: 4548703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A NEW LOOK AT THE ILLINOIS MEDICAL PRACTICE ACT. THOMSEN PG IMJ Ill Med J; 1964 Apr; 125():345. PubMed ID: 14138344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The new medical practice act: implications for medical discipline. Walker WN; Williams PW W V Med J; 1980 Sep; 76(9):233-5. PubMed ID: 6944963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Disciplining the errant physician: in Virginia, investigations show an increase. Carroll GJ Va Med; 1979 May; 106(5):400-1. PubMed ID: 463257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of the Georgia laws regulating physicians and physician's assistants to activities undertaken in conjunction with federally-created health care programs. Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1981 Feb; 70(2):119-21. PubMed ID: 6111579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Professional medical discipline: an overview. Vacanti CJ N Y State J Med; 1989 Apr; 89(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 2733874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]