216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10288150)
1. Performance appraisal model enforces guest relations.
Hosp Guest Relations Rep; 1988 Jul; 3(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 10288150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Special report: Enforcing guest relations.
Hosp Guest Relations Rep; 1986 May; 1(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 10283434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of radiologic technologists: a method for improving the communicative process.
Kettlehake JE; Malott JC
Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10288781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance appraisal as a management tool in two hospitals.
Baird R
Med Rec News; 1980 Feb; 51(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 10245214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. SOCAP (Society of Consumer Affairs Professionals) speech stresses ways to improve guest relations.
Hosp Guest Relations Rep; 1988 Jun; 3(6):7-9. PubMed ID: 10287877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ensuring interest in follow-up programs.
Hosp Guest Relations Rep; 1988 Aug; 3(8):3-5. PubMed ID: 10288154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Meeting the challenge: a multidisciplinary clinical ladder program.
Davis D; Dixon M; Harrison S; Pentland A; Rackley L; Young W
Adm Radiol; 1991 Jan; 10(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 10109717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Weighting performance made our merit raises fairer.
Alcala A; Evans M; Flynn K; Hardin M; McElhiney B; Shaw P; Westfall J
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1990 Jun; 22(6):35-7, 40. PubMed ID: 10106706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance standards: how to assess and address human resource needs.
Vann B; Clinton M
Radiol Manage; 1988; 10(3):63-6. PubMed ID: 10288306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A program for technologist rejection rate using the home computer.
Cottrell GA
Radiol Manage; 1985 Sep; 7(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 10281498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Criticism is the road to improvement in the health sectors].
Kristensen P
Sygeplejersken; 1983 Nov; 83(46):4-8. PubMed ID: 6559453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Guidelines for evaluating department managers.
Schoenhard WC
Hosp Prog; 1978 Oct; 59(10):60-2. PubMed ID: 689658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strengthening the nursing service organization.
Ganong J; Ganong W
J Nurs Adm; 1977 Sep; 7(7):14-5, 52. PubMed ID: 587722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance standards for social workers.
Harkness L; Mulinski P
Soc Work; 1988; 33(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 10288324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Criteria-based performance appraisal systems.
Bishop P
Admit Manage J; 1988; 14(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 10288484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Combining guest relations and admitting to improve patient satisfaction and hospital cash flow.
Hosp Guest Relations Rep; 1987 Jun; 2(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 10283450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Standards of performance: a model for development in health care.
Desnoyer JM; Barr NJ; O'Brien MK
J Healthc Educ Train; 1987; 2(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10283513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can doctors compete with their own hospital?
Owens A
Med Econ; 1992 Sep; 69(17):117-8, 120, 127-8 passim. PubMed ID: 10120554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and use of a method of assessing patient perception of care.
Taylor PW; Nelson-Wernick E; Currey HS; Woodbury ME; Conley LE
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1981; 26(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 10251438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regular management development program pays extra dividends.
Beresford A
Hosp Adm Can; 1976 Dec; 18(12):26, 28. PubMed ID: 10241860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
