These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10288495)
1. Surveys: more than stargazing. Rippey JH CAP Today; 1987 Sep; 1(9):2, 4, 20. PubMed ID: 10288495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Surveys gain impressive stats. Titus K CAP Today; 1987 Sep; 1(9):1, 5-6. PubMed ID: 10325203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. CAP (College of American Pathologists) program probes lab quality. Koska MT Trustee; 1989 Oct; 42(10):15. PubMed ID: 10295758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The business man and the laboratory: standards guarantee profits. Hamer JW Malays J Pathol; 1997 Dec; 19(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 10879248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reference values and participant means as targets in proficiency testing. Tholen DW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Sep; 117(9):885-9. PubMed ID: 8368899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collaborative Lab Advantage program to combine expertise, services. Jt Comm Perspect; 2003 Mar; 23(3):5. PubMed ID: 12685286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving quality of care in cath labs: an ACC initiative. Cohen AG; Mermelstein PD; McEntee CW J Cardiovasc Manag; 2001; 12(6):17-20. PubMed ID: 11765623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pump up your PT IQ. Cembrowski GS; Anderson PG; Crampton CA; Coupland R; Carey RN MLO Med Lab Obs; 1996 Jan; 28(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 10172547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. CAP laboratory standard leads to controversy. Chapman-Cliburn G Hospitals; 1988 Mar; 62(5):67, 69-70. PubMed ID: 3338781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer testing scandal shines spotlight on black box of clinical laboratory testing. Hede K J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Jun; 100(12):836-7, 844. PubMed ID: 18544732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Protection against lab-acquired infection: a new safety manual. Hallam K MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Jan; 20(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 10285821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring the quality of testing performed by referral laboratories. Wilding P; Hall R MLO Med Lab Obs; 1994 Mar; 26(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 10138086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of evaluation criteria in the College of American Pathologists Surveys. Ross JW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 3355327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance programs in the United States. Lawson NS Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1995; 31(1):21-35. PubMed ID: 8546370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A surprise visit from OSHA. Daigneault R MLO Med Lab Obs; 1990 Jan; 22(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 10103422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The College of American Pathologists and National Society for Histotechnology workload study. Kohl SK; Lewis SE; Tunnicliffe J; Lott RL; Spencer LT; Carson FL; Souers RJ; Knapp RH; Movahedi-Lankarani S; Haas TS; Brown RW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Jun; 135(6):728-36. PubMed ID: 21631265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CAP (College of American Pathologists) program probes quality of lab performance. Koska MT Hospitals; 1989 Sep; 63(18):42. PubMed ID: 2767652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The LIS: the overlooked tool for TQM. Hunter LL; Vanderslice LM Comput Healthc; 1991 Sep; 12(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 10112904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Looking for a solution. Review process questioned after Maryland fiasco. Fong T Mod Healthc; 2004 May; 34(19):17-8. PubMed ID: 15164701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]