These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10288934)
1. An individualistic approach to routine cadaver organ removal. Peters DA Health Prog; 1988 Sep; 69(7):25-8. PubMed ID: 10288934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why we must leave our organs to others. Hester DM Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):W23-8. PubMed ID: 16885086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why consent may not be needed for organ procurement. Delaney J; Hershenov DB Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):3-10. PubMed ID: 19998145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Organ procurement and mandated choice: an alternative to the existing system. Starr B Princet J Bioeth; 2000; 3(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 11936139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protecting autonomy in organ procurement procedures: some overlooked issues. Peters DA Milbank Q; 1986; 64(2):241-70. PubMed ID: 3713651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The moral duty to contribute and its implications for organ procurement policy. Menzel PT Transplant Proc; 1992 Oct; 24(5):2175-8. PubMed ID: 1413022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A unified approach to organ donor recruitment, organ procurement, and distribution. Peters DA J Law Health; 1988-1989; 3(2):157-87. PubMed ID: 11652565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The quest for organ donors: a theological response. Thomasma DC Health Prog; 1988 Sep; 69(7):22-4, 28. PubMed ID: 10288933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Religious justifications for donating body parts. May WF Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Feb; 15(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 3980204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Routine recovery: an ethical plan for greatly increasing the supply of transplantable organs. Spital A; Taylor JS Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2008 Apr; 13(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18685304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Autonomy attitudes in the treatment compliance of a cohort of subjects with continuous psychotropic drug administration]. Baumann M; Trincard M Encephale; 2002; 28(5 Pt 1):389-96. PubMed ID: 12386539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the possibility of "progress" in managing biomedical technologies: markets, lotteries, and rational moral standards in organ transplantation. Shapiro MH Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003; 31(1):13-69. PubMed ID: 15214334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whose tissues are they anyway? A proposal for state ownership of the human body and its parts. Schoenfeld MR J Cardiovasc Diagn Proced; 1994-1995; 12(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 11654296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rationale for organ donation: charity or duty? Peters DA J Med Humanit Bioeth; 1986; 7(2):106-21. PubMed ID: 10280411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A matter of priority: transplanting organs preferentially to registered donors. Kolber AJ Rutgers Law Rev; 2003; 55(3):671-740. PubMed ID: 16189910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Organs for all. Taylor G Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):46-7. PubMed ID: 11644997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The give and take of organ procurement. Martin DK; Meslin E J Med Philos; 1994 Feb; 19(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 8201290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy. Kamisar Y Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]