These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10289106)
21. The Saikewicz case sparks interest in living will. Euthanasia News; 1978; 4(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11664926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases. King JC Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination. Gilbert LJ J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath. Glantz LH; Swazey JP Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical ethics in the courtroom: the need for scrutiny. Pellegrino ED; Sharpe VA Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(4):547-64. PubMed ID: 2674888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of judges in life/death decisions for the neurologically impaired. Beresford HR Ann Neurol; 1978 Nov; 4(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 736527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Carroll PR Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases. Buchanan A Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment. Hayman S Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly. Baron CH J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient. Brennan TA Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):204-9. PubMed ID: 3205051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado. Albert LA J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The specter of Joseph Saikewicz: mental incompetence and the law. McCormick RA; Hellegers AE America (NY); 1978 Apr; 138(12):257-60. PubMed ID: 11664885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. In thunder, lightning or in rain: what three doctors can do. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(5):28-30. PubMed ID: 3692804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Substituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent. Santurri EN; Werpehowski W Thought; 1982 Dec; 57(227):484-501. PubMed ID: 11649637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment. Malloy SE Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Canadian Charter of Rights and individual choice in treatment. Ferguson G Health Law Can; 1988; 8(3):63-70, 85. PubMed ID: 10312613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged. United States Catholic Conference Origins; 1989 Oct; 19(21):345-51. PubMed ID: 11652554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]