280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10289145)
1. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
Glantz LH; Swazey JP
Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 10289145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient?
Ramsey P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Saikewicz decision: a medical viewpoint.
Relman AS
Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 736045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Law-medicine notes. "No code" orders: clarification in the aftermath of Saikewicz.
Schram RB; Kane JC; Roble DT
N Engl J Med; 1978 Oct; 299(16):875-8. PubMed ID: 692582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Carroll PR
Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
Buchanan A
Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
Glantz LH; Swazey JP
Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Judicial approach beginning to develop for terminating life support systems. Part 1.
Weissburg C; Hartz JN
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Aug; 12(4):44-8. PubMed ID: 10242941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Incompetent's right to die: who decides?
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Sep; 53(17):39, 42. PubMed ID: 457072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of judges in life/death decisions for the neurologically impaired.
Beresford HR
Ann Neurol; 1978 Nov; 4(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 736527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chemotherapy withheld from retarded patient.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1978 May; 59(5):94, 96. PubMed ID: 274438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Judges at the bedside: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10289106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1985; 18(2):95-141. PubMed ID: 4086738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The patient's right to die.
Rozovsky L
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Jan; 56(1):38-9. PubMed ID: 761731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Do not resuscitate and the removal of life support.
Plumeri PA
J Clin Gastroenterol; 1984 Feb; 6(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 6699397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain death/termination of heroic efforts to save life--who decides?
Ufford MR
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1980 Dec; 2(10):5-39. PubMed ID: 10295069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical paternalism and the rule of law: a reply to Dr. Relman.
Baron CH
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):337-65. PubMed ID: 507055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Refusing life-sustaining medical treatment.
Saunders EK
Mo Med; 1990 Sep; 87(9):665-7. PubMed ID: 2215468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-Saikewicz judicial actions clarify the rights of patients and families.
Glantz LH
Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10240215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying.
Hudson RP
J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
