These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10289216)

  • 1. The legal perspective. How much process is due?
    Johnson RL
    Trustee; 1979 Oct; 32(10):12-4, 16, 19-20. PubMed ID: 10289216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Duties and potential liability of nonhospital entities in credentialing physicians.
    Griffith RL
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 10160755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical peer review under legal knife.
    Kosterlitz J
    Natl J (Wash); 1988 Mar; 20(13):820. PubMed ID: 10286588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review/hospital privileges/credentialing.
    Springer EW
    Leg Med; 1994; ():57-81. PubMed ID: 7830486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny.
    LaCava FW
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Staff privileges--$2 million antitrust judgment reversed.
    Carlson DR
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(21):1-4. PubMed ID: 10284024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The physician and hospital privileges.
    Hirsch HL
    Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():179-91. PubMed ID: 10287959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply?
    Meghrigian AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician in a hospital setting.
    Zaslow J
    Leg Med; 1985; ():323-33. PubMed ID: 3869660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antitrust law and the medical staff.
    Holthaus D
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review in the wake of Patrick.
    McCormick B
    Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):17. PubMed ID: 10288090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Hosptal Care: Delineation of pediatric privileges in hospitals.
    Pediatrics; 1982 Nov; 70(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 6957842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review after Patrick case is alive and well.
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1988 Oct; 62(20):34. PubMed ID: 3169708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review, privileges: MDs fear legal tangles.
    Koska MT
    Trustee; 1990 Feb; 43(2):19. PubMed ID: 10104264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Patrick case: will it hinder peer review?
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1988 Jun; 62(12):56. PubMed ID: 3378770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physicians' rights as hospital staff members.
    Fenton HR
    Hosp Physician; 1988 Apr; 24(4):36-8, 40-1, 44. PubMed ID: 10286646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review immunity after Patrick v. Burget.
    Kelly JP
    Healthspan; 1988 Jun; 5(6):2-5. PubMed ID: 10288658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review after Patrick.
    Bierig J
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Jun; 21(6):135-9. PubMed ID: 10287912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk.
    Halper HR; Kazon PM
    Bus Health; 1988 Jul; 5(9):40-1. PubMed ID: 10288490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court decides Patrick; peer review alive and well despite ruling.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(13):1-5. PubMed ID: 10287418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.