262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10289639)
1. Medical staff monitoring functions: medical record review.
JCAH Perspect; 1985; 5(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10289639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
Lewis KS
Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Aug; 12(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10112162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review?
Spath PL
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical pertinence review.
QRC Advis; 1989 Nov; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10295774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical staff monitoring functions: departmental review.
JCAH Perspect; 1985; 5(6):5-8. PubMed ID: 10289683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
Schraffenberger LA
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):43-50. PubMed ID: 10292964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Best practices in record completion.
Doyon C
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 15500017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical record authentication standards revised.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1996; 16(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 10162445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Corrections to 2005 requirements for hospitals.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Oct; 24(10):10. PubMed ID: 15560421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The delinquent medical record: new solutions to an old problem.
Adineh M; Price CR
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Sep; 7(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 10289702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review complements QI efforts.
O'Leary DS
Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(4):2-3, 5. PubMed ID: 10120864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical record review.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1987; 7(9-10):8-10. PubMed ID: 10289804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Charting a course toward legible medical records. Perfect paperwork can mean financial savings, better patient care.
Weber DO
Physician Exec; 2002; 28(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 11806236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 1995 survey process update. Review of closed medical records in hospitals has been improved.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1995; 15(2):12. PubMed ID: 10142861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical record statistics form for hospital surveys modified.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10346339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Criteria for evaluating medical records.
Affeldt JE
Hospitals; 1979 Jan; 53(2):29. PubMed ID: 281320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Policy set for use of preprinted medical records.
JCAH Perspect; 1983; 3(3):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10289472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical staff: what should trigger a focused review?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2007 Oct; 32(10):137-8, 143. PubMed ID: 17957881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Patrick v Burget.
JCAH Perspect; 1986; 6(7-8):7-9. PubMed ID: 10289700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preprinted and delinquent medical records.
JCAH Perspect; 1987; 7(7-8):7-8. PubMed ID: 10289786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
