These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10289695)

  • 1. A guide to hospital accreditation.
    Schumacher PM
    Trustee; 1986 Jun; 39(6):13-4. PubMed ID: 10289695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. JCAHO may revamp basic survey process.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 1999 Jun; 29(25):8. PubMed ID: 10538605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. JCAHO begins unannounced surveys this month.
    Green J
    Health Facil Manage; 1993 Jul; 6(7):59-61. PubMed ID: 10126770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. JCAHO revises review policy.
    Ferman J
    Healthc Exec; 1999; 14(6):50-1. PubMed ID: 10623162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusted 2006 thresholds for preliminary denial of accreditation and conditional accreditation for hospitals.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 May; 26(5):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16739382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communication efforts expanded for hospital accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1994; 14(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 10134618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accreditation: chance for education as well as evaluation.
    Politser P
    Trustee; 1982 Sep; 35(9):30-6, 40. PubMed ID: 10289358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ORYX data to play key role in new JCAHO survey process.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Jan; 28(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12561296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lessons learned: what to expect from shared visions--new pathways.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 Jan; 29(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 14708490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inspecting the inspectors: feds target JCAHO.
    Hosp Case Manag; 1997 Aug; 5(8):149-51. PubMed ID: 10169513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accreditation nomenclature revised, survey report clarified.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(3-4):6. PubMed ID: 10313768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint Commission creates opportunities for feedback from accredited organizations.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1993; 13(4):14, 17. PubMed ID: 10129236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calculating the ORYX 20 percent requirement.
    Weber D
    QRC Advis; 1997 Nov; 14(1):5. PubMed ID: 10175181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The implications of conditional accreditation.
    O'Leary DS
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(1-2):2-3. PubMed ID: 10313761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changing the rules. With hospitals increasingly dissatisfied with the accreditation process and its high costs, the JCAHO overhauls its approach.
    Morrissey J
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Oct; 32(40):8-9, 16, 3. PubMed ID: 12389315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Special briefing for health care consultants.
    Schraffenberger LA
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1987 Oct; 58(10):48-50. PubMed ID: 10289792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tips for a better survey. "Canned" presentations by hospital staff can get in the way.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1995; 15(2):13. PubMed ID: 10142862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. JCAHO may shorten accreditation cycle.
    Moore JD
    Mod Healthc; 2000 Jun; 30(24):2-3, 12. PubMed ID: 11183499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. JCAHO approves new plan for conditional accreditation.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Feb; 19(7):2-3. PubMed ID: 10324609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Joint Commission's agenda for change.
    Ente BH
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1989; 11(2):6-14. PubMed ID: 10293152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.