313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10289703)
1. Hospital must abide by contractual agreement despite JCAH standards.
Fraiche DD; Carlson WT
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):9-10. PubMed ID: 10289703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Attack being mounted against court's 'antitrust' branding of M.D. contract.
Nickles P; Tucker G; Brown M
Mod Healthc; 1983 May; 13(5):162, 164, 166. PubMed ID: 10260311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Exclusive contract case sets important antitrust precedent, considerations.
Halper HR
Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):52-3. PubMed ID: 10267657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Law-medicine notes. Exclusive hospital-medical service arrangements for anesthesiology: antitrust consequences.
Curran WJ
N Engl J Med; 1984 Jul; 311(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 6738618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. High court relaxes exclusive-contract antitrust rules in Hyde.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):74-9. PubMed ID: 6724551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fifth Circuit finds exclusive contract for anesthesia services violates antitrust laws.
Peterson RN
Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(21):4-5. PubMed ID: 10256931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Antitrust developments. Hospital exclusive contracts and the Department of Justice vertical restraints guidelines.
Miles JJ
Health Law Vigil; 1985 Mar; 8(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 10270265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in antitrust/exclusive contract action.
Tomaselli LA
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Nov; 6(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10263299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The courts look at the exclusive contract for providing anesthesia services.
Kucera WR
AANA J; 1981 Apr; 49(2):174-6. PubMed ID: 7223347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The U.S. Supreme Court looks at hospital-physician relationships: the Hyde decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1984; 29(3):36-49. PubMed ID: 10266558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court approves hospital's exclusive contract.
Comiskey MP; Cullinane JS
Hosp Prog; 1984 May; 65(5):24-5. PubMed ID: 10266501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Supreme Court's Hyde decision: what is its significance?
Waxman M; Enders RJ
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(3):51-3. PubMed ID: 10266389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract against antitrust challenge in Hyde case.
Tomaselli LA
Health Law Vigil; 1984 Apr; 7(8):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10265826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exclusive contracts--a new court interpretation.
Manson JN
AANA J; 1982 Dec; 50(6):583-4. PubMed ID: 7164762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Supreme Court relaxes exclusive contract rules in antitrust decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Trustee; 1984 Jun; 37(6):34-8. PubMed ID: 10266797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde: return to reality in economic power analysis in tying cases.
Bern RC
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1986 Aug; 8(6):7-35. PubMed ID: 10277805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract in Hyde antitrust decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 May; 13(5):2-9. PubMed ID: 10266239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enter exclusive contracts for right reasons.
Holthaus D
Hospitals; 1989 Feb; 63(4):40. PubMed ID: 2914683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do exclusive hospital contracts constitute antitrust?
Albertson D
Physicians Manage; 1984 Mar; 24(3):61, 64-5. PubMed ID: 10278235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Exclusive contracts in anesthesia are still held viable.
Manson JN
AANA J; 1982 Oct; 50(5):486-7. PubMed ID: 7180372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
