843 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10290103)
1. Dodging the bullet: avoiding conspiracy claims in professional staff disputes.
Piché GR
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1988; 33(4):531-42. PubMed ID: 10290103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical staff privileges: is antitrust a real issue for providers?
Enders RJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Mar; 40(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 10275454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antitrust implications of allied health practitioner privilege decisions and hospital-physician exclusive contracts.
Miles JJ
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10289814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antitrust issues in the health care field: an introduction.
Bressler HJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Apr; 23(4):97-100, 114. PubMed ID: 10104711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Denying hospital privileges to non-physicians: does quality of care justify a potential restraint of trade?
Reindl G
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1988 May; 9(11):7-39. PubMed ID: 10286963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: a view from the Federal Trade Commission.
Horoschak MJ
Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):17-24. PubMed ID: 10116790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The antitrust laws: implications for physician staff privileges.
Peters ME
J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1987; 10(2):206-18. PubMed ID: 10286042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical staff antitrust decisions examine defenses available to defendants.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Jun; 7(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 10104849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Courts more likely to dismiss doctors' antitrust suits filed against hospitals.
Horty J
Mod Healthc; 1987 Jul; 17(14):144. PubMed ID: 10282785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Antitrust and hospital peer review.
Blumstein JF; Sloan FA
Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):7-92. PubMed ID: 10295966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Eleventh Circuit allows state action defense in medical staff antitrust case.
Miller RD
Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Jan; 6(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 10292016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court: activity must affect Interstate Commerce to invoke Sherman Act.
Carlson DR
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):7-9. PubMed ID: 10276712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy?
Pollner F
Med World News; 1988 Jun; 29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10287973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Antitrust and the credentialing of physicians.
Miles JJ
Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 10284308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Antitrust immunity in Colorado peer review actions.
Earnest GL
Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Dec; 7(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 10296371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Antitrust laws should help NPs.
Klein CA
Nurse Pract; 1987 Nov; 12(11):39-40, 45, 48-9. PubMed ID: 3320826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Seventh Circuit will deem future antitrust challenges frivolous.
Rothschild IS
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(20):5-7. PubMed ID: 10278589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Coastal Neuro-Psychiatric broadens state action exemption protection for hospital credentialing decisions.
Lipsetts PG
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10278410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 3rd Circuit finds evidence insufficient for antitrust summary judgment.
Carlson DR
Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 10287416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. District court denies summary judgment on physician's antitrust claim.
Urbanski MF
Health Law Vigil; 1988 Oct; 11(21):5-6. PubMed ID: 10288891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
