These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
836 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10290103)
41. The Supreme Court, antitrust and the health care field. Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(22):1-14. PubMed ID: 10257142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Radiology v. neurology: civil war over CT scanning in VA's Shenandoah Valley. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jul; 10(15):5-8. PubMed ID: 10282649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. AHA joins appeal in antitrust case. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1990 Apr; 20(16):8. PubMed ID: 10104449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The antitrust perspective on health industry competition. Miller FH J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1989; 12(1):128-48. PubMed ID: 10296433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The role of quality of health care considerations in antitrust analysis. Kauper TE Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):273-340. PubMed ID: 10296906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The year in review: significant health antitrust cases. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(11):3-7. PubMed ID: 10276706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Physicians under siege: the Federal Trade Commission versus the physicians of St. Francis Hospital. Rosen BF Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):73-6. PubMed ID: 10290186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Exclusive contracts under antitrust attack. Reed TJ; Allen HS Hosp Med Staff; 1982 Nov; 11(11):2-9. PubMed ID: 10257181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Hospital's denial of privileges does not violate antitrust act. Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Jan; 7(1):9. PubMed ID: 10278108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. HMOs, doctor groups and antitrust laws: an overview. Weissburg C; Waxman JM Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(2):83-4, 86. PubMed ID: 10254434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Antitrust and hospital privileges. I. Federal jurisdictional requirements. Tabor WJ JAMA; 1984 May; 251(20):2654-5. PubMed ID: 6716591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Hyde decision affirms current practice. Jones KB Pa Med; 1984 May; 87(5):22. PubMed ID: 6539895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Denials of staff privileges face increased antitrust scrutiny. Jacobsen RA; Wiggins RB Health Care Manage Rev; 1992; 17(4):7-15. PubMed ID: 1428862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Exclusive contract case sets important antitrust precedent, considerations. Halper HR Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):52-3. PubMed ID: 10267657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. High court relaxes exclusive-contract antitrust rules in Hyde. Reed TJ; Allen HS Hospitals; 1984 Jun; 58(11):74-9. PubMed ID: 6724551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Hospital antitrust suit settled. Am Med News; 1981 Nov 20-27; 24(44):9. PubMed ID: 10253695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply? Meghrigian AG Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. FTC, medical staffs reach agreements. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 Feb; 18(6):6. PubMed ID: 10285864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]