These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10290183)

  • 1. Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review.
    Thompson RE
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):39-49. PubMed ID: 10290183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From quality assurance to continuous quality improvement.
    Thompson RE
    Physician Exec; 1991; 17(5):3-8. PubMed ID: 10160793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whose quality of care is it, anyway?
    Laird E
    Ohio Med; 1991 Nov; 87(11):527, 555. PubMed ID: 1758672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidentiality and quality assurance.
    Williams R
    Health Law Can; 1990; 10(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 10113115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review complements QI efforts.
    O'Leary DS
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1991; 11(4):2-3, 5. PubMed ID: 10120864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality assurance to continuous quality improvement: challenges for the medical staff.
    Zusman J
    Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 10122124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data.
    Stevens M
    Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Your stake in hospital-based strategies for liability control.
    Johnston DW
    Consultant; 1988 Aug; 28(8):83-90. PubMed ID: 10289839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physician autonomy vs. accountability: making quality standards and medical style mesh.
    Larson L
    Trustee; 2007; 60(7):14-6, 21, 1. PubMed ID: 17685362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical staff motivation and peer review.
    Merry MD
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Dec; 5(2):21-31. PubMed ID: 10268842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Professionalism, accountability and peer review.
    Luke RD; Modrow RE
    Health Serv Res; 1982; 17(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 6954151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HCQIA's grant of immunity: panacea or Pandora's box.
    Scott C
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Jan; 9(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10116004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review: a new tool for quality improvement.
    Edwards MT
    Physician Exec; 2009; 35(5):54-9. PubMed ID: 19780389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physician review and quality assurance.
    Dallman JJ
    Hosp Physician; 1988 Mar; 24(3):8, 13. PubMed ID: 10289841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. QA methodologies.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Jan; 5(3):6-8. PubMed ID: 10303667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review. An Australian perspective.
    Wilson LL
    Med J Aust; 1979 Dec; 2(13):686-9. PubMed ID: 530193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986.
    George JE; Rouse AR
    N J Med; 1987 Jun; 84(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 3475597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance in the provision of hospital care. Role of the administrator.
    Mansfield EO
    Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):71-3. PubMed ID: 4593006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementing an interdepartmental QA program in a small rural hospital.
    Bushy A; Tyler P
    J Nurs Qual Assur; 1989 Feb; 3(2):41-51. PubMed ID: 2913014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disciplinary actions and due process. Peer review. Part II.
    Harty-Golder B
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1993 Jul; 80(7):485-7. PubMed ID: 8089651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.