BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10290199)

  • 1. Courts rule on physician privileges.
    May K
    Nurs Homes Sr Citiz Care; 1988; 37(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10290199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corporate liability: the duty to select and monitor visiting physicians (supervise and report).
    Hirsh HL
    Nurs Homes; 1984; 33(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 10283966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Injunction revoking physician's privileges at nursing home upheld.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 May; 6(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 10294153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The problem physician: legal threat or legal menace?
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1982 Feb; 37(9):35-6. PubMed ID: 10254665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revocation of staff privileges: due process responsibilities.
    Geiersbach SA
    Mich Hosp; 1983 Mar; 19(3):13-6. PubMed ID: 10258813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expanded hospital liability: implications for the delineation of medical staff privileges.
    Batty CR
    Health Law Can; 1984; 4(4):92-102. PubMed ID: 10310690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Court sets rules on physician suspensions.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1988 Mar; 18(12):43. PubMed ID: 10286496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hospital privileges: speak softly, but carry a big lawyer.
    Chenen AR
    Med Econ; 1986 Apr; 63(8):151-5. PubMed ID: 10275940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The disruptive physician: handle with care.
    Hollowell EE
    Trustee; 1978 Jun; 31(6):11-3, 15, 17. PubMed ID: 10307838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physician in a hospital setting.
    Zaslow J
    Leg Med; 1985; ():323-33. PubMed ID: 3869660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Piercing the doctrine of corporate hospital liability.
    Cohoon JB
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1981 Aug; 3(6):5-23. PubMed ID: 10295123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Summary suspension of physician privileges warranted if conduct endangers patients.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1982 Nov; 63(11):77, 79. PubMed ID: 10257127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use and abuse of summary suspension in medical staff disputes.
    Connor GW; Pearson RG
    QRC Advis; 1989 Jan; 5(3):1, 4-6. PubMed ID: 10324663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Malicious deprivation of hospital staff privileges.
    Firestone MH; Schur R
    Leg Med; 1986; ():199-215. PubMed ID: 3312890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fifth Circuit: hospitals did not violate the Sherman Act.
    Fraiche DD; Carlson WT
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 10277100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The physician and hospital privileges.
    Hirsch HL
    Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():179-91. PubMed ID: 10287959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The present status of physician privileges.
    Goldsmith LS; Bertolet M
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(2):121-37. PubMed ID: 6927795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A nonphysician permitted to practice medicine.
    Johnson MP
    Case Stud Health Adm; 1980; 2():163-7. PubMed ID: 10250490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to deal with the disruptive physician.
    Purtell DJ
    Hosp Med Staff; 1981 Jan; 10(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 10249746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Court upholds hospital board's denial of staff privileges.
    Pickens A
    Tex Med; 1979 Jan; 75(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 425042
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.