155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10290407)
1. Interim guidance for wraps for surgical instrument trays, pending publication of British standard specifications for disposable tray wraps.
J Sterile Serv Manage; 1988 Aug; 6(2):9. PubMed ID: 10290407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reprocessing. Opened but unused: FDA mulls policy.
Gearon CJ
Hosp Health Netw; 2002 Nov; 76(11):14. PubMed ID: 12465577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Put those nagging sterilization worries to rest, once and for all.
McCormack J
Mater Manag Health Care; 1995 Sep; 4(9):50, 52. PubMed ID: 10151140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reuse of disposables. Investigate outsourcing companies with care.
Reichert M
OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 10157850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Residual organic debris on processed surgical instruments.
DesCôteaux JG; Poulin EC; Julien M; Guidoin R
AORN J; 1995 Jul; 62(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 7574561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonwoven materiel: manufacturing processes for sterilization wraps.
Gorman NE
Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1988 Feb; 9(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 10285700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Technical session 2--Standards for non-woven fabrics used as surgical gowns, drapes and tray wraps.
Coates DA
J Sterile Serv Manage; 1985 Jun; 3(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10272821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic instruments. Patient care, cost issues.
Reichert M
AORN J; 1993 Mar; 57(3):637-51, 654-5. PubMed ID: 8439132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A semidisposable punchblock with the disposable superblade trephine: a good combination with which to obtain donor corneal disc.
Völker-Dieben HJ; Fakkel J; Worst J; Kok-van Alphen CC
Doc Ophthalmol; 1982 Jan; 52(3-4):447-50. PubMed ID: 7040009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Examining liability risks in disposable reuse.
OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):10, 16. PubMed ID: 10157851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized single-blinded in vitro and ex vivo evaluation of new and reprocessed laparoscopic trocars.
Mues AC; Haramis G; Casazza C; Okhunov Z; Badani KK; Landman J
J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):738-43. PubMed ID: 21036630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The microbial and physical quality of recycled gloves.
Hagos B; Kibwage IO; Mwongera M; Muthotho JN; Githiga IM; Mukindia GG
East Afr Med J; 1997 Apr; 74(4):224-6. PubMed ID: 9299822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endosurgery instruments: reusables vs disposables.
Patterson D
OR Manager; 1993 Jan; 9(1):1, 6-8. PubMed ID: 10123465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments.
Voyles CR
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1993 Sep; 78(9):38-9. PubMed ID: 10128066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A new standard for sterility testing for autoclaved surgical trays.
Widmer AF; Houston A; Bollinger E; Wenzel RP
J Hosp Infect; 1992 Aug; 21(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 1355781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hostile world.
Shimkus J
Mater Manag Health Care; 1998 Feb; 7(2):24-5, 27. PubMed ID: 10180778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Disposable surgical instruments.
Biomed Eng; 1969 Aug; 4(8):378-9. PubMed ID: 5810505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the magnitude and costs of intraoperative inefficiencies attributable to surgical instrument trays.
Stockert EW; Langerman A
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Oct; 219(4):646-55. PubMed ID: 25154669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caution about disposable vein strippers.
Stary DR; Graham AR
Med J Aust; 1986 Feb; 144(3):165-6. PubMed ID: 3945210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Contract processing and sterilization.
Morganstern KH
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1991 Oct; 9(9):16, 19-20, 22-4. PubMed ID: 10114070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
