These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10290477)
1. A look at nursing peer review, delegation rules. Waddill L Tex Hosp; 1988 Sep; 44(4):35-7. PubMed ID: 10290477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Self-regulation in the nursing profession: response to substandard practice. Supples JM Nurs Outlook; 1993; 41(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8430039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing Peer Review in the hospital. Stetzer SL J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 1978 Dec; 9(4):44-7. PubMed ID: 282400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting peer review actions to the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. Young MG Tex Med; 1989 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2922688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A professional recognition system using peer review. Davis SE J Nurs Adm; 1987 Nov; 17(11):34-8. PubMed ID: 3668674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Processing complaints and disciplining nurses. An overview of the investigative process by the Kansas State Board of Nursing. Tidwell S Kans Nurse; 2002 Jan; 77(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16381379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three methods of nursing audit. Trout F Dimens Health Serv; 1974 Sep; 51(9):38-40, 43-4. PubMed ID: 4153529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review--a working experiment. Gold H; Jackson M; Sachs B; Van Meter MJ Nurs Outlook; 1973 Oct; 21(10):634-6. PubMed ID: 4492798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Head nurse planning boosts staff nurse involvement. The Duke University Hospital experience in QA. Fenlon P Nurs Adm Q; 1977; 1(3):44-7. PubMed ID: 585423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases. Leiker M WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health visitor who falsely claimed she had carried out patients' reviews. Castledine G Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 28-May 11; 14(8):451. PubMed ID: 15924026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Audits could have significant meaning for you. Jenkins C Ohio Nurses Rev; 1992 Jul; 67(5):3. PubMed ID: 1528564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review: a perspective for performance appraisal. O'Loughlin EL; Kaulbach D J Nurs Adm; 1981 Sep; 11(9):22-7. PubMed ID: 6912299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the credibility of a clinical ladder review process: an interrater reliability study. Froman RD Nurs Outlook; 2001; 49(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 11182722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Developing a peer review process to facilitate skill acquisition for clinical performance and advancement. King J Nurs Adm Q; 1982; 6(4):20-4. PubMed ID: 6921506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Questions and answers on nursing management: observation of the rules and regulations agreed upon at the staff meeting at the ward]. Hatta S Kango Tenbo; 1988 Jun; 13(7):744. PubMed ID: 3419213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]