These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10290517)

  • 21. Health technology assessment.
    Hailey D
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The examining room--technology assessment: the fallibility factor.
    Felch WC
    Internist; 1979 Sep; 20(7):11,16. PubMed ID: 10243878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health technology assessment for radiologists: basic principles and evaluation framework.
    Lim ME; O'Reilly D; Tarride JE; Burke N; Ferrusi IL; Campbell K; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 19394570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Life-cycle management: a long-term challenge.
    Newman C
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Apr; 14(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 12789698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Issues in technology assessment.
    McGivney WT
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Nov; 16(11):208-9. PubMed ID: 10312300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Techniques for assessing the impact of new technologies in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Berwick DM
    Respir Care; 1986 Jun; 31(6):524-32. PubMed ID: 10315704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Technology assessment: the missing human dimension.
    Boyle P; Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(3):38-9. PubMed ID: 11643002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Early technology assessment of new medical devices.
    Pietzsch JB; Paté-Cornell ME
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 18218167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Health technology assessment and public health: a time for convergence.
    Battista RN; Lafortune L
    Eur J Public Health; 2009 Jun; 19(3):227. PubMed ID: 19380330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The changing face of health technology assessment.
    Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):289. PubMed ID: 19394565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. High-energy versus low-energy external biphasic defibrillators.
    Health Devices; 2003 May; 32(5):205-6. PubMed ID: 12827943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Introduction: health technology assessment in diagnostic imaging.
    Carlos RC; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):297-8. PubMed ID: 19394569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying medical outcomes for more effective delivery. Interview by Jane Stein.
    Eddy DM
    Bus Health; 1986 Sep; 3(9):47-8, 50. PubMed ID: 10277404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.
    Siebert M; Clauss LC; Carlisle M; Casteels B; de Jong P; Kreuzer M; Sanghera S; Stokoe G; Trueman P; Lang AW;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 12391964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating an EHR? Use the opportunity to assess your overarching technology solution.
    Denny J
    Tenn Med; 2011 Apr; 104(4):33. PubMed ID: 21560907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of the Office of Health Technology Assessment in Medicare coverage decisions.
    Marshall JE; Carter ED
    J Health Care Technol; 1986; 3(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 10301219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technology assessment: measuring the outcomes of laboratory practice.
    Wilkinson DS
    Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2000; 14(6):267-71. PubMed ID: 11210211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proper device analysis requires adequate preparation. Involving end users helps ensure ownership, buy-in and acceptance.
    Cusick C
    Mater Manag Health Care; 2007 Jul; 16(7):38-41. PubMed ID: 17955934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Supporting CPR development with the commercial off-the-shelf systems evaluation technique: defining requirements, setting priorities, and evaluating choices.
    Celli M; Ryberg DE; Leaderman AV
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 1998; 12(4):11-9. PubMed ID: 10345829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nanotoxicology and nanomedicine: making hard decisions.
    Linkov I; Satterstrom FK; Corey LM
    Nanomedicine; 2008 Jun; 4(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 18329962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.