These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10290870)

  • 21. What we need to know about performance appraisals.
    Danzig SM
    Manage Rev; 1980 Feb; 69(2):20-4. PubMed ID: 10247311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improve performance by appraisal.
    Waldman DA; Kenett RS
    HRMAGAZINE; 1990 Jul; 35(7):66-9. PubMed ID: 10105423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of health professionals should be judged by variety of factors.
    Chenoweth D
    Occup Health Saf; 1988 Aug; 57(9):23. PubMed ID: 3173957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The key to choosing your quality coordinator.
    Dick T
    JEMS; 1990 Jun; 15(6):83-5. PubMed ID: 10105495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The performance appraisal: the most needed and neglected supervisory tool.
    Binis RA
    Superv Manage; 1978 Oct; 23(10):12-6. PubMed ID: 10238649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Staff evaluation of supervisors.
    Martin JA
    Spec Libr; 1979 Jan; 70(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 10241486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A productivity triangle: three steps to good employee performance.
    Ryder JD
    Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1985 Aug; 7(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 10272338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combing BARS and MBO6: using an appraisal system to diagnose performance problems.
    Schneier CE; Beatty RW
    Pers Adm; 1979 Sep; 24(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 10243666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chart auditing.
    Rowe RM
    Emerg Med Serv; 1983; 12(3):90-2. PubMed ID: 10260780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Employee evaluation: it's a dirty job, but somebody's got to do it.
    Jensen J
    Grantsmanship Cent News; 1980; 8(4):36-45. PubMed ID: 10247628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Staff evaluation: an assessment of approaches.
    Calkin JD
    Health Care Superv; 1984 Jul; 2(4):68-78. PubMed ID: 10266420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Setting up a system of pay for performance.
    Barros A
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Nov; 18(11):39-45. PubMed ID: 10281018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Job evaluation systems.
    Dean J
    Top Health Care Financ; 1980; 6(3):75-80. PubMed ID: 7376186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Utilization of an appraisal system in conjunction with preestablished behavioral objectives.
    Oliver EJ; Mahoney CD
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1981; 3(4):8-11. PubMed ID: 10253730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A different approach to merit increases.
    Fleuter DL
    Pers J; 1979 Apr; 58(4):225-6, 262. PubMed ID: 10241466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Getting a handle on performance measurement.
    Scott S
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Mar; 7(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 10286583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Starting an assessment center the correct way.
    Byham WC
    Pers Adm; 1980 Feb; 25(2):27-32. PubMed ID: 10245723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A three-part performance appraisal system.
    Khan MK
    Can J Med Technol; 1982 Jun; 44(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 10256198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Policy and procedure manual. Employee anecdotal record.
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1987; 9(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 10284117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.