These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An institutional approach to developing guidelines for the use of low-osmolality contrast agents. Swanson DP Appl Radiol; 1988 May; 17(5):27-8. PubMed ID: 10287384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in a price-sensitive environment. Steinberg EP; Anderson GF; Powe NR; Sakin JW; Kinnison ML; Neuman P; White RI AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Aug; 151(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 3260719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Draft recommendations for evaluation of radiation exposure in diagnostic radiology examinations. Burkhart RL; Gross RE; Jans RG; McCrohan JL; Reuter FG; Rosenstein M Radiol Manage; 1983 Sep; 5(4):34-41. PubMed ID: 10263551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeat analysis in radiology: a method of quality control. Dodd BC Can J Radiogr Radiother Nucl Med; 1983; 14(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 10262102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality control in diagnostic radiology: (an update for Ontario). Kruger GW Dimens Health Serv; 1978 Sep; 55(9):42. PubMed ID: 689327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The radiographer's role in increasing the efficiency of the diagnostic imaging department. Racoveanu NT Radiography; 1984; 50(592):151-8. PubMed ID: 6463221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilization review in diagnostic imaging: can quality be cost effective? Schwartz HW Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):40-5. PubMed ID: 10289801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New directions in diagnostic imaging: venture into change and opportunity. Schwartz HW Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 10302721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Management in the current health care environment. Schwartz HW Radiol Manage; 1989; 11(3):49-54. PubMed ID: 10303741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]