These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. S.B. 1211--California's new peer review legislation. Keenan KM Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(3):65-8. PubMed ID: 10105014 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy? Pollner F Med World News; 1988 Jun; 29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10287973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act): CA doctors decide to opt out. Koska MT Hospitals; 1988 Jul; 62(13):56. PubMed ID: 3384420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pilot program in California: medical societies' role may expand. Am Med News; 1978 Oct; 21(40):1, 11. PubMed ID: 10238639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act: two states opt out. Kadzielski MA Rev Fed Am Health Syst; 1989; 22(5):41-2. PubMed ID: 10294797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. California's approach to the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Lang HL Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 10110715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informal peer review actions: can they survive the Health Care Quality Improvement Act? Gleitz HG; Strickland NE Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 10293721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. They just don't get it. Hackney VH; Le Grand AC Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Dec; 10(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10122732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical staff peer review--living with the Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Gleitz HG; Strickland NE Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):1-12. PubMed ID: 10290180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Some practical questions regarding the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986. Gleitz HG Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):24-34. PubMed ID: 10284644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Putting HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) to the test. QRC Advis; 1992 Jul; 8(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 10183677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review: a double whammy in California. Carlova J Med Econ; 1985 Dec; 62(26):79-80. PubMed ID: 10274637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review splits Calif. medical community. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 Oct; 18(44):98. PubMed ID: 10290221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--what it means to the physician. Curtis T Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 10284643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liability for peer review and privilege suspension. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1984 Jul; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 10267575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: an overview of its immunity provisions. Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 10284641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations. Valiant C Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]