These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10291177)

  • 1. Rationalizing technology.
    LeTouzé D
    Hosp Trustee; 1988; 12(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 10291177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technology assessment.
    Schechter MT; Birnbaum D
    J Healthc Mater Manage; 1989; 7(8):66-8. PubMed ID: 10296416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trustee development program. The board's role in the planning and acquisition of clinical technology.
    Trustee; 1979 Jul; 32(7):47-50, 53-5. PubMed ID: 10242735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lithotripsy for treating gallstone disease: a good investment?
    Alder H
    Trustee; 1989 Oct; 42(10):18-9. PubMed ID: 10295760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The imaging question.
    Montagnolo AJ
    Trustee; 2011 Jun; 64(6):25-6, 1. PubMed ID: 21776943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technology acquisition in Ontario hospitals. Part 1: Requests for technology consistently exceed capital funding capabilities.
    Fuchs M; Deber RB
    Hosp Trustee; 1987; 11(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 10284448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Creative competitive advantage through information technology. Trustees should think of technology as an investment in the future.
    Peterson R
    Trustee; 1990 Nov; 43(11):10-1. PubMed ID: 10107631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Managing technology assessment and acquisition.
    Sprague GR
    Healthc Exec; 1988; 3(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 10302988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technology acquisition in Ontario hospitals.
    Fuchs M; Deber RB
    Hosp Trustee; 1987; 11(6):12-3, 21. PubMed ID: 10284821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determining the feasibility of new technology.
    Turner BN
    Trustee; 1986 Aug; 39(8):29-30. PubMed ID: 10277828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Capital equipment requests: a formal review process.
    Fagan AE
    Hosp Trustee; 1989; 13(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 10292478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing the impact of DRG-PPS on capital investments.
    Caterinicchio RP
    Adm Radiol; 1987 Mar; 6(3):29-30, 32. PubMed ID: 10312057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laser technology feasibility planning.
    Health Technol; 1988; 2(6):238-44. PubMed ID: 10303217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Governance in multihospital systems: an assessment of decision-making responsibility.
    Alexander JA; Schroer KA
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):9-20. PubMed ID: 10300014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MRI field strength: how important a criterion?
    Health Technol; 1988; 2(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 10286001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New technologies for your hospital to consider. A strategic planning and capital budgeting checklist.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(4):138-48. PubMed ID: 10301776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technology assessment in teaching hospitals.
    Menon D; Marshall D
    Dimens Health Serv; 1990 Mar; 67(2):26-8. PubMed ID: 2194871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capital ideas.
    Dahl D; Styer P
    Mater Manag Health Care; 1999 Mar; 8(3):22, 24. PubMed ID: 10351574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Future improvements in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Health Technol; 1988; 2(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 10286000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technology decisions: high prices, hard choices.
    Ward RD
    Mich Hosp; 1990 Mar; 26(3):34-8. PubMed ID: 10106493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.