These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10291429)

  • 1. Testimony before the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine. Committee on utilization management by third parties.
    Appel FA
    J Qual Assur; 1988; 10(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 10291429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Written testimony for the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine. Committee on Designing a Strategy for Quality Review and Assurance.
    Wildman G
    J Qual Assur; 1988; 10(4):13. PubMed ID: 10303142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accreditation for UR firms.
    QRC Advis; 1991 Apr; 7(6):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 10109919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation.
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hospitals and review.
    Thompson RW
    Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):400-2. PubMed ID: 4073390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hospital use of billing data for quality improvement.
    DePorter J
    J AHIMA; 1992 Apr; 63(4):46-8. PubMed ID: 10118750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New federal regulations, professional standards review organization, JCAH and criteria development.
    Tucker JH; Rogers J
    Med Rec News; 1975 Feb; 46(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 10318407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing utilization review program results.
    Martin M; Milstein A; Loveland DV
    Health Cost Manage; 1988; 5(2):10-6. PubMed ID: 10286636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance and medical stupidity.
    Glover JL
    Am Surg; 1991 Aug; 57(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 1928988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I.
    Politser P
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preferred provider organizations: balancing quality assurance and utilization review.
    Burgess CL
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():275-93. PubMed ID: 10288423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Special report. Strategies for assessing HMOs. How to check out an HMO.
    Bus Health; 1990; [STRATEGIES]():22-3. PubMed ID: 10114344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A qualitative assessment of previous efforts to contain hospital costs.
    Pearson DA; Abernethy DS
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1980; 5(1):120-41. PubMed ID: 7190584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality Assurance Program: AHA's attempt to keep the medical review function in the hospital.
    Mod Hosp; 1973 Mar; 120(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 4798717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A patient care review model to suit both hospitals and PSROs.
    Thompson RE
    Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(16):61-3. PubMed ID: 7190542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PRO review changes affect quality management.
    Martin CA
    J Qual Assur; 1988; 10(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 10303143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance, IV: Medicare conditions of participation and quality assurance.
    Harris-Wehling J; McGeary MG
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 Oct; 17(10):320-3. PubMed ID: 1745531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Report of the National Professional Standards Review Council Meeting, May 27-28, Washington, DC.
    Med Rec News; 1975 Aug; 46(4):80-4. PubMed ID: 10318408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A 'suggested' utilization review committee plan and (available) HEW guidelines concerning U.R.
    J Am Health Care Assoc; 1975 Jul; 1(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 10621732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National comparative standards: a priority for evaluating resource utilization.
    Ward TF
    Dimens Health Serv; 1987 Jun; 64(5):26. PubMed ID: 3653545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.